[–] [deleted] 1 point (+1|-0) [deleted] Nice. and this gem, by a sjw gatekeeper: >The study is “methodologically flawed” and “fails to meet the standards of the bibliometric community,” says Cassidy Sugimoto, an information scientist at Indiana University in Bloomington, who has published on gender disparities in science and was asked by ScienceInsider to review Strumia’s paper. The study contains “several unsubstantiated claims,” she says, and doesn’t properly cite or discuss papers that come to conflicting conclusions. “Overall,” Sugimoto says, “the manuscript does not provide a convincing understanding of the literature or the methods, lessening the credibility of the results.” Never lists the flaws, the standards, or the claims. So.... just her feelings? Secretly she wants the paper author's hard male physics cock.