More like Tyranno-Communist.
This guy gets it.
More like Tyranno-Communist.
This guy gets it.
Anarcho Tyranny is an oxymoron. Anarchy simply means No Rulers. If there are no Rulers there is no tyranny. Words mean things and AnarchoTyranny is a word for etymological retards.
But it made him sound smart, and that's what we want right reeeeee etc.
Hahaha. That was funny. Thanks for the giggle.
Anarcho-tyranny means that there are two sets of rules: anarchy for the groups that the controlling party supports, and tyranny for those that they don't. See: the UK giving a six-month suspended sentence for a child-raping imam, while giving a two-year jail sentence for someone that threw a bacon sandwich at a mosque (who was later murdered in jail by muslims that were offended).
But by definition, anarchy does not exist when there is a "controlling party". Anarchy is literally Without Rulers.
State of existence in which there is a controlling party is mutually exclusive from a state of existence in which there are no rulers.
AnarchoTyrrany is an oxymoron and an expression of doublethink.
(post is archived)