WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

637

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

More like Tyranno-Communist.

[–] 1 pt

Anarcho Tyranny is an oxymoron. Anarchy simply means No Rulers. If there are no Rulers there is no tyranny. Words mean things and AnarchoTyranny is a word for etymological retards.

[–] 1 pt

But it made him sound smart, and that's what we want right reeeeee etc.

[–] 0 pt

Hahaha. That was funny. Thanks for the giggle.

[–] 0 pt

Anarcho-tyranny means that there are two sets of rules: anarchy for the groups that the controlling party supports, and tyranny for those that they don't. See: the UK giving a six-month suspended sentence for a child-raping imam, while giving a two-year jail sentence for someone that threw a bacon sandwich at a mosque (who was later murdered in jail by muslims that were offended).

[–] 0 pt

But by definition, anarchy does not exist when there is a "controlling party". Anarchy is literally Without Rulers.

State of existence in which there is a controlling party is mutually exclusive from a state of existence in which there are no rulers.

AnarchoTyrrany is an oxymoron and an expression of doublethink.