WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

808

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

So just before the rooftop Korean gets attacked and also arrested for defending himself.

[–] 1 pt

This is the weakness of the left in full display, they can't fight a real man on their own, they need their paid thugs to do the things they're too weak and incompetent to do themselves.

Any of those soyboy fags would have gotten completely wrecked by that guy but they act tough because they know the zogbots will help out.

[–] 1 pt

He hit first. That's what should've happened. If he had waited for the abtifa pussy to touch him it would've been self defense.

[–] 2 pts

WDYM? People have the right to protest without having reprobate degenerates attack. His personal space is slowly being encroached upon by communist fags and fat bitches who keep charging.

Do you expect him to do exhaust all is traveling options, end up against the chain link fence, and then only then while he is the most vulnerable defend himself against a hoard of 20 once they start hitting him? LOL

[–] 3 pts

A physical altercation is the fault of the initiating party. He doesn't have to give up any ground and as soon as they touch him he can beat ass. The cops did exactly what the cops were supposed to do and the antifa faggot knew it. He wasn't ever going to hit that beaner, he's a scared silly faggot behind that mask. He was antagonizing him to get hit so the cops would arrest him. They are soros funded and soros trained they use jew tactics. Dont touch someone unless they touch you or you are the one going to jail

[–] 1 pt

>He doesn't have to give up any ground and as soon as they touch him he can beat ass.

You mean it's legit to be standing there, not move, then as soon as they rub forearms with you from getting so close it's fair game? I'm asking because I really don't know.

[–] 0 pt

Soros owns the judges and the district prosecutors, he also funds pantifa, therefore the cops will not fuck with pantifa.

[–] 1 pt

The cops don't care, they're there to protect pantifa, because the people signing their paychecks tell them to. They are not on your side.

[–] 0 pt

Nah fuck that, and fuck your (((laws))).

No one, in the history of history, has won a war abiding by the enemies rulebook.

[–] 0 pt

I'm not saying to live by the rulebook. I'm saying what the rulebook is.

[–] 0 pt

>No one, in the history of history, has won a war abiding by the enemies rulebook.

True

Thing is, the war and the enemy haven't been officially declared...

Hence, catch22, the cucking...

So being surrounded by a menacing mob means nothing in the eyes of the law? I can't wait until someone has enough and kills a group group of these faggots.

[–] 1 pt

Unfortunately no. Once they threaten your body or life you can claim self defense. That has to be recorded, as well as your repeated declaration of fear for your life and defensive posturing. Then you can blast em.

[–] 0 pt

So being surrounded by a menacing mob means nothing in the eyes of the law?

Let's say it's not a clear cut type of situation when it comes to it https://www.diegocriminaldefense.com/denver-criminal-defense-areas-of-practice/menacing/

Menacing can either be a misdemeanor or felony charge. Menacing is a class 3 misdemeanor if a person, by threat or physical action, knowingly places or attempts to place another in fear of imminent serious bodily injury. However, menacing is a class 5 felony if committed by the use of a deadly weapon or any item that would cause another to reasonably believe that item is in fact a deadly weapon, or if committed by a person acting as if they are actually armed with a deadly weapon.

An essential element of both misdemeanor and felony menacing is a specific intent to cause fear in the victim. Intent to actually harm the victim is unnecessary. In fact, it is unnecessary for the victim to actually hear or be aware of any threat from the defendant; it is also unnecessary that the victim actually experience any fear. Rather, if the prosecution can present evidence from which the jury can reasonably conclude that the defendant knew his actions, if discovered, would place the victim in fear of imminent serious bodily injury, then the intent element of the crime can be established.