![Sucks to be you [GIF - 1.25MB]](https://pic8.co/sh/IkHkZX.gif){kind=link}
“I FUCKIN LOVE SOYANCE”
“I FUCKIN LOVE SOYANCE”
I've only seen one case where a white father thought that a clearly halfbreed baby was his, and he was a Christian.
Also, anyone here who hates on atheists is a shill. Calling it now. You aren't a Christian, you are a paid shill who is trying to stor up division on the behalf of some kike that's financing you to do so.
Religion has long since been identified by shills as a point of division within our community and you are doing what you can to try and turn us against our sub communities using that as your angle.
We got photos that were taken of the contracts you signed, the various orders you are given, how you don't get paid for doing a shit job.
Every time I've found one of you anti-atheist types on here or anywhere else in the realm of the politically dissident internet, you turn out to be a shill.
Every time.
You never contribute anything useful, you just try to piss people off and then start accusing anyone who calls you out as being a jew, you never argue your positions.
On places like this, you block me immediately and then pretended I'm not responding because you stumped me.
It's stupid, bit I have to call you out every time you show yourselves, for the sake of those who stumble upon you and assume you are acting in good faith (lol).
I've only seen one case where a white father thought that a clearly halfbreed baby was his, and he was a Christian.
Also, anyone here who hates on atheists is a shill. Calling it now. You aren't a Christian, you are a paid shill who is trying to stor up division on the behalf of some kike that's financing you to do so.
Religion has long since been identified by shills as a point of division within our community and you are doing what you can to try and turn us against our sub communities using that as your angle.
We got photos that were taken of the contracts you signed, the various orders you are given, how you don't get paid for doing a shit job.
Every time I've found one of you anti-atheist types on here or anywhere else in the realm of the politically dissident internet, you turn out to be a shill.
Every time.
You never contribute anything useful, you just try to piss people off and then start accusing anyone who calls you out as being a jew, you never argue your positions.
On places like this, you block me immediately and then pretended I'm not responding because you stumped me.
It's stupid, bit I have to call you out every time you show yourselves, for the sake of those who stumble upon you and assume you are acting in good faith (lol).
2 hour old account and 5 posts.
Yup.
2 hour old account and 5 posts.
Yup.
It's more about his post content.
All his posts contribute nothing.
No new ideas, no useful information, nothing but reports of old /pol/ memes.
The primary identifier of a shill is that they say nothing that does anything other than allow them to blend in or to stir up a shitstorm.
If they attack atheism or Christianity, they never actually make arguments or engage with the arguments of their opponents, their only response is to sow more chaos.
They don't care about the truth because they are here to shut down thought and crash forums, not to participate.
They dont mean what say, so they'd have a problem defending it, their reasons for their positions are disgenuine.
If anti atheist, they hate us because we are leftists and have no philosophy except the one that the community they are speaking to at the time universally hates the most (in the 90's on YouTube being atheist made you a nazi and racist, now and here, it makes you a commie and anti-racist). Basically the entry level arguments of conservative Christians during the God wars in the 90's and early 2000's.
If anti Christian, it's because Christ was a jew and Christianity is a hippie socialist globalist religion. Basically the entry level arguments of far right atheists in the 90's and early 2000's.
In both cases there are major flaws, in the first, the lack of a philosophy rooted in supernatural beleifs does not mean a lack of philosophy, in fact one can even follow the philosophical ideas of Christianity as an atheist. Second, even in a vacuum of philosophy, atheists are free to choose what they believe in, they are still able to be far right. (One point I'd like to address is the"if there is no heaven, why not just die right now?" To which I respond "if there is nothing after death, wouldn't that instead be an argument to live as long as possible amd get the most out of life? Since it's the only time I know I can get anything, and it's going to and anyway?" The other question is "if you believe in heaven, why not kill as many Christians as possible? since then you are sending them to heaven as Martyrs before they can sin and fall to hell?" Of course, both are equally silly questions to ask, neither are worth talking on since intelligent men can easily counter and dismiss them)
For the second, it can be argued that even if we accept that Jesus was a jew, and his teachings were far left, that it is irrelevant because Christianity comes from Christians, not the Bible or its characters, if Christians think Jesus was Aryan and prowhite, then that is the Christian position. Second, you can argue that jesus wasnt a jew and that his teachings are being misinterpreted, thst the Bible and its characters are in fact entirely in line with the far right ideologies.
There's more but I've written enough here.
I take neither of these lines of arguement seriously, the best thing to do is let the anti atheist shills and anti Christian shills duke it out while letting everyone else know that they are both shills.
Like putting down a "wet floor" sign.
Don't ban them, they are useful examples to keep around, and if you get rid of these types, they just evolve new strategies to attack our communities with that we then have to detect and counter all over again.
It's more about his post content.
All his posts contribute nothing.
No new ideas, no useful information, nothing but reports of old /pol/ memes.
The primary identifier of a shill is that they say nothing that does anything other than allow them to blend in or to stir up a shitstorm.
If they attack atheism or Christianity, they never actually make arguments or engage with the arguments of their opponents, their only response is to sow more chaos.
They don't care about the truth because they are here to shut down thought and crash forums, not to participate.
They dont mean what say, so they'd have a problem defending it, their reasons for their positions are disgenuine.
If anti atheist, they hate us because we are leftists and have no philosophy except the one that the community they are speaking to at the time universally hates the most (in the 90's on YouTube being atheist made you a nazi and racist, now and here, it makes you a commie and anti-racist). Basically the entry level arguments of conservative Christians during the God wars in the 90's and early 2000's.
If anti Christian, it's because Christ was a jew and Christianity is a hippie socialist globalist religion.
Basically the entry level arguments of far right atheists in the 90's and early 2000's.
In both cases there are major flaws, in the first, the lack of a philosophy rooted in supernatural beleifs does not mean a lack of philosophy, in fact one can even follow the philosophical ideas of Christianity as an atheist.
Second, even in a vacuum of philosophy, atheists are free to choose what they believe in, they are still able to be far right.
(One point I'd like to address is the"if there is no heaven, why not just die right now?" To which I respond "if there is nothing after death, wouldn't that instead be an argument to live as long as possible amd get the most out of life? Since it's the only time I know I can get anything, and it's going to and anyway?" The other question is "if you believe in heaven, why not kill as many Christians as possible? since then you are sending them to heaven as Martyrs before they can sin and fall to hell?" Of course, both are equally silly questions to ask, neither are worth talking on since intelligent men can easily counter and dismiss them)
For the second, it can be argued that even if we accept that Jesus was a jew, and his teachings were far left, that it is irrelevant because Christianity comes from Christians, not the Bible or its characters, if Christians think Jesus was Aryan and prowhite, then that is the Christian position.
Second, you can argue that jesus wasnt a jew and that his teachings are being misinterpreted, thst the Bible and its characters are in fact entirely in line with the far right ideologies.
There's more but I've written enough here.
I take neither of these lines of arguement seriously, the best thing to do is let the anti atheist shills and anti Christian shills duke it out while letting everyone else know that they are both shills.
Like putting down a "wet floor" sign.
Don't ban them, they are useful examples to keep around, and if you get rid of these types, they just evolve new strategies to attack our communities with that we then have to detect and counter all over again.
(post is archived)