WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

159

The least and most complicit banks Our research assesses banks’ policies around financing military and weapons in general; evidence of financing companies supplying weapons to Israel; and evidence of financing companies linked to settlements. This is set out in the three tables below.

The companies that appear not to finance any settlement or weapons/military activity, and are therefore considered the least complicit or not at all complicit, are:

Al Rayan Co-operative Bank Cumberland Building Society Metro Bank Monzo Nationwide Building Society Revolut Starling Triodos The most complicit banks – which have recently financed companies involved in settlements and supply of weapons to the Israeli military, are:

Barclays HSBC JP Morgan Chase Lloyds Group NatWest Group Santander Group Explanation of our ratings We assessed banks against three different policies and practices:

Policies around weapons/military beyond excluding the most controversial weapons (table 2) Provides financing for weapons/military (table 3) Finances companies linked to settlements (table 4) For each of these aspects there were three ratings:

Least complicit (best): no involvement, or had a policy against financing Middle: some involvement, company not mentioned in major investigative reports Most complicity (worst): actively funds military involvement, no restrictions, listed in investigative reports

The least and most complicit banks Our research assesses banks’ policies around financing military and weapons in general; evidence of financing companies supplying weapons to Israel; and evidence of financing companies linked to settlements. This is set out in the three tables below. The companies that appear not to finance any settlement or weapons/military activity, and are therefore considered the least complicit or not at all complicit, are: Al Rayan Co-operative Bank Cumberland Building Society Metro Bank Monzo Nationwide Building Society Revolut Starling Triodos The most complicit banks – which have recently financed companies involved in settlements and supply of weapons to the Israeli military, are: Barclays HSBC JP Morgan Chase Lloyds Group NatWest Group Santander Group Explanation of our ratings We assessed banks against three different policies and practices: Policies around weapons/military beyond excluding the most controversial weapons (table 2) Provides financing for weapons/military (table 3) Finances companies linked to settlements (table 4) For each of these aspects there were three ratings: Least complicit (best): no involvement, or had a policy against financing Middle: some involvement, company not mentioned in major investigative reports Most complicity (worst): actively funds military involvement, no restrictions, listed in investigative reports

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

My guess is they all do, to one degree or another. Maybe not the locally owned banks