I knew what was going to be in the article before I read it. It didn't take long for them to get to the reason why. Also, no other interviews were reported or given except for Awed.
>“At the end of the day, everybody wants to feel safe, and safety is a priority for all communities,” Awed said. “And we need more officers. Unfortunately, this policy … has really pit neighborhoods against each other.”
>Awed said that the poorer neighborhoods have to find creative ways to feel safe, especially when more diverse neighborhoods are the ones that are seeing the most increase in violence and shootings in the city.
I was going to copy/paste snippets and comment, but there were so many, I didn't have time to do it justice. I'll cut to the chase: repercussions are a bitch.
It wouldn't surprise me one bit if there's many "crowd funding" for patrols also support/ed BLM.
The government should be worried about this because next thing you know, people will do things like crowdfund roads, schools, military and so on completely bypassing the need for government.
People could come to the conclusion that government is totally unnecessary.
(post is archived)