Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

723

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts (edited )

Sure you do. "That was actually cronyism." "That's not truly a free market."

EDIT: But actually after reading the article I agree. We don't see libertarians endorsing a system and then disavowing the same system a few years later, as the Left does (eg. the case of Chavez in Venezuela).

[–] • 1 pt

Because "Corporate Totalitarianism" isn't as catchy.

It would be great if we actually practiced capitalism and a free market, but I think Wall Street reminded everyone that isn't the case.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Our system is a direct command economy which is a feature of communism. THe own nothing part is coming and will wake a lot of faggots up far to late for them to do anything about it.

[–] • 1 pt

It depends on how you define "own nothing" that can be a good thing.

No car, no trinkets, barely any furniture (I am single and live alone,) tiny self sufficient home. The amounts it's saved me is why I am retiring at 42.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Owning nothing by choice is dissimilar from owning nothing by force.