WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

The idea behind it is pretty badass from an amphibious landing perspective.

The idea behind it is pretty badass from an amphibious landing perspective.
[–] 1 pt

Same here. It is interesting

[–] 0 pt

Sounds cool, but stupid and illogical. A simple shoulder mounted rocket launcher or some drones would end the attack before it even starts. There is no sneaking up to a coastline these days. Especially with ships that size. Do they think the enemy will sit back and wait for them to fully dock with each other? Do they think the enemy will wait while they lower the (slow) hydrolic legs? Aside from the 1hr offload time, I'm willing to bet docking and stabilization also take at least an hour. Not to mention the sea has to be pretty calm for all this docking to take place at all. Everything about china is fake and gay.

[–] 0 pt

Every nation considering shore landing assaults, knows how many lives it will cost.

No military is going to bring these boats ion first. You bring this stuff in after you have secured the initial beach head.

An assault on a beach needs resupply. You dont land this type of ship, Until you own that beach, then the 2, or 10 hours it takes to set that ship up, doesnt matter.

Scream and cry all you want to. This is a pretty badass amphibious assault idea.

Everyone understands the waste of life and equipment it is to assault and then secure a beachhead these days. You are a fucking moron if you honestly believe China's leadership doesnt understand these things also. A bigger fucking moron if you honestly believe what you typed.

Thanks for being an angry asshat.