No. They're based on weaponized data.
No. They're based on weaponized data.
Now comes news that a British climate committee assigned to develop “net zero” goals may have used ‘insufficient data.’
Sir Chris Llewellyn Smith, who led a recent Royal Society study on future energy supply, said that the Climate Change Committee only “looked at a single year” of data showing the number of windy days in a year when it made pronouncements on the extent to which the UK could rely on wind and solar farms to meet net zero.
“They have conceded privately that that was a mistake,” Sir Chris said in a presentation seen by this newspaper. In contrast, the Royal Society review examined 37 years worth of weather data.
[Source.](https://legalinsurrection.com/2024/01/british-scientist-admits-climate-change-committees-net-zero-goals-based-on-insufficient-data/)
>
Now comes news that a British climate committee assigned to develop “net zero” goals may have used ‘insufficient data.’
>>
Sir Chris Llewellyn Smith, who led a recent Royal Society study on future energy supply, said that the Climate Change Committee only “looked at a single year” of data showing the number of windy days in a year when it made pronouncements on the extent to which the UK could rely on wind and solar farms to meet net zero.
>>
“They have conceded privately that that was a mistake,” Sir Chris said in a presentation seen by this newspaper. In contrast, the Royal Society review examined 37 years worth of weather data.
(post is archived)