WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

941

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

Does being a high IQ race matter if that race is unwilling to reject authority in the name of logic and reason?

[–] 4 pts (edited )

'Vaccinated' Japan Brought to its Knees by Covid: Record Hospitalizations and Deaths

489 deaths.

Nothingburger3 .

[–] 1 pt

Thought the .jp were using ivm

[–] 0 pt (edited )

As far as I know Japan didn’t have a mainstream anti‐ivermectin campaign and doctors were free to prescribe it, but I have no information on how widely it’s being used there.

[–] 1 pt

I realy remeber a post where ivm was given out atthe gov level like 4-5 3mg tabs per citizen

[–] 1 pt

death waves 4x greater than the stronger alpha strain, when there was no vaccine available and more extremely sick and old to pump numbers, that have increased from 2x and 3x in the last year, for a bioweapon you know is targeted towards Whites and east Asians

It's fine.

[–] 2 pts

4x greater than nothing is still nothing. Japan's population was 126,476,461 people in 2020. 489 people is 0.00039% of their population.

[–] 0 pt

non-existent AEC2 diversity in east Asian population that is experiencing rising lethality with every wave of a bioweapon and it is nothing because the current daily fatality rate is 39/100,000

All up in the coolaid, when your fed ass wants to push the racial element to act natsoc, but you don't know the flavor.

Sigh.

[–] 3 pts

Japan is officially the most “vaccinated” country in the world. 83% of the population has at least one dose of the anti-Covid vaccine, 82% two doses, and 132% the third dose and the fourth dose, the latter being made with the vaccine adapted for the Omicron variant.

Say what? How can 132% of the population be vaccinated with something?

[–] 2 pts

Looks like a typo, probably 32%, since 83% has at least one dose.

Supposedly Australia or NZ would be more jabbed as they tout jab rates in the high 90% range for first jab. But that may be through statistical fuckery of only taking "eligible people" into account. I also remember Portugal having a jab rate over 100%, but I think that was due to migrant workers having a jab mandate or something. They were counted in the jabbed numerator but not in the population denominator.

[–] 1 pt

They don't track third and fourth doses individually. So some percentage higher (x) than 66 has the third booster and (132-66+(x)) has had the 4th booster.

[–] 2 pts

Interesting but... pretty sure that's not how this works. Think it's a typo.

[–] 1 pt
[–] 0 pt

The maths never add up these (())() days