Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

I think this may be the first time I’ve seen you praising Hendrix in such a manner. I’ll admit I didn’t make it through all of this one as other things are demanding my attention, but I am pretty sure you haven’t mentioned him in this favorable a light before.

[–] • 1 pt

Oh, I'm just elaborating on a theme and used more words to say what I say pretty much every week.

[–] • 1 pt

So purely for the record, you do accept that Hendrix was in fact a good guitarist?

[–] • 0 pt

Good? Yes.

That's not a high bar. Give yourself a decade and you'll be a good guitarist.

Great? Not even remotely.

Greatest? Not a chance.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

That is just your opinion man.

[–] • 0 pt

At the absolute end of the day, that's true.

However, I'm actually qualified to hold and state opinions from a position of being an authority on the subject. I also provide evidence for my conclusions, demonstrate the framework, and have explained the methodology.

You are actually obliquely mentioned in today's article!

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I'll save my time and assume it is insulting.

[–] • 0 pt

That's a pretty good assumption! In fact, I make space for everyone to be insulting! We even pause, just to engage in juvenile insults!

It's a commentary about the people who make comments from a standpoint of willful ignorance and opine about the subject matter without actually understanding it or reading the article! You know, those people who comment without actually reading the article.

I want to thank you for your great efforts at demonstrating the point so well. You did good!

Your response was well timed and very much thematic!