WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Indians are White now?

[–] 1 pt (edited )

No, they are just our less evolved genetic neighbors... from the next neighborhood.

[–] 1 pt

But no, there were Aryans but they mixed with Dravadians and we were gone.............some with almost pure Aryan blood still exist there but very very few.

[–] 0 pt

This is a simplified representation of genetic ancestry, but Aryan is/was a genetic point in time (if you will) that has further evolved since.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

They are Indo-European / Aryan. Which is why I dismiss it when someone tries to claim Aryan / Indo-European as "Our People". It's too broad to be useful.

Whites are Germanic.

The Greeks, The Italics, The Gauls, The Iberians, they are all very fine "Honorary Whites. But because we must have standards, the only "True Whites" are the Germanic peoples. Otherwise, you end up with a Street Shitter at your family reunion.

[–] 1 pt

If you're going to be that semantic, the germans are less white than nordics and "white" people with those bright blue eyes and blonde hair got that from Nordic ancestry (like in Britain and Western Europe)

You are correct. The Nordics are the Whitest of White.

Here's the test. "Would you let your daughter fuck person X?". A Street Shitter? No fucking way. You can hem and haw about Brittains, but we can both agree that the Aryan angle is bullshit because we both recognize that Indians are not "Our People".

[–] 1 pt

That's interesting

[–] 0 pt

fake and gay

[–] 0 pt

...OK, then post the real and straight one.

[–] 0 pt

That drawing implies that we all share a common ancestor

That is simply not the case

I do not have a drawing to show you handy and I do not feel like searching for one.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Except for Africans, we do have a common ancestor called neanderthals. You're misconstruing the dimentionality of the multiple ancestral branches in the linage -- a genetic neighbor does not imply that they are the same. The further back it goes is still difficult to determine, but it can be traced to more recent genotypes.

What I've posted is of course a simplified version of the history, but serves to illustrate the point.