Good to know... What's the point of applying it if its not doing what it says it is.
Archive: https://archive.today/C8xJe
From the post:
>At least half the sunscreens that failed to meet their SPF claims in recent testing had their original SPF certification conducted at an overseas laboratory whose test results are now being called into question by senior industry experts.
An ABC investigation can reveal that the lab, Princeton Consumer Research (PCR) is used by a wide range of sunscreen makers to verify their SPF claims before they are allowed on the Australian market.
Consumer group Choice released test results from an Australian lab for 20 popular sunscreens last month and found that 16 of them did not meet their SPF 50 label claim, including one that returned an SPF result of just four.
Good to know... What's the point of applying it if its not doing what it says it is.
Archive: https://archive.today/C8xJe
From the post:
>>At least half the sunscreens that failed to meet their SPF claims in recent testing had their original SPF certification conducted at an overseas laboratory whose test results are now being called into question by senior industry experts.
An ABC investigation can reveal that the lab, Princeton Consumer Research (PCR) is used by a wide range of sunscreen makers to verify their SPF claims before they are allowed on the Australian market.
Consumer group Choice released test results from an Australian lab for 20 popular sunscreens last month and found that 16 of them did not meet their SPF 50 label claim, including one that returned an SPF result of just four.