WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

NYT: "The reader learns that Churchill was also an advocate of policies usually identified with the Labor Party: a national health service, wider access to education, taxation of excess profits and profit-sharing. In fact, during his first public speech in 1897, three years before he entered Parliament, Churchill said he looked forward to the day when laborers would become shareholders in the businesses where they worked. Rather generously, Mr. Gilbert maintains that Churchill was "a consistent and lifelong liberal in outlook."

One of the values of this single-volume biography is that certain of Churchill's lifelong attitudes emerge more clearly. Mr. Gilbert, who is also the author of major works on Auschwitz, the Holocaust and Arab-Israeli conflicts, is especially strong in tracking Churchill's personal involvement in Middle Eastern affairs, his support for an identifiable Jewish brigade in the British Eighth Army in Italy during World War II and his influence in supporting the creation of a Jewish state after the war. For these views he sometimes found himself at odds with his own Conservative Party, but as usual, he stuck to his guns. Again and again, the author illustrates Churchill's fortitude and long-range sense of history.

During the crisis between Egypt and Israel in 1956, for example, Churchill informed a wavering President Dwight D. Eisenhower: "I am, of course, a Zionist, and have been ever since the Balfour Declaration. I think it is a wonderful thing that this tiny colony of Jews should have become a refuge to their compatriots in all the lands where they were persecuted so cruelly, and at the same time established themselves as the most effective fighting force in the area. I am sure America would not stand by and see them overwhelmed by Russian weapons, especially if we had persuaded them to hold their hand while their chance remained."

>NYT: "The reader learns that Churchill was also an advocate of policies usually identified with the Labor Party: a national health service, wider access to education, taxation of excess profits and profit-sharing. In fact, during his first public speech in 1897, three years before he entered Parliament, Churchill said he looked forward to the day when laborers would become shareholders in the businesses where they worked. Rather generously, Mr. Gilbert maintains that Churchill was "a consistent and lifelong liberal in outlook." >One of the values of this single-volume biography is that certain of Churchill's lifelong attitudes emerge more clearly. **Mr. Gilbert, who is also the author of major works on Auschwitz, the Holocaust and Arab-Israeli conflicts**, is especially strong in tracking Churchill's personal involvement in Middle Eastern affairs, his support for an identifiable Jewish brigade in the British Eighth Army in Italy during World War II **and his influence in supporting the creation of a Jewish state after the war.** For these views he sometimes found himself at odds with his own Conservative Party, but as usual, he stuck to his guns. Again and again, the author illustrates Churchill's fortitude and long-range sense of history. >During the crisis between Egypt and Israel in 1956, for example, Churchill informed a wavering President Dwight D. Eisenhower: **"I am, of course, a Zionist, and have been ever since the Balfour Declaration.** I think it is a wonderful thing that this tiny colony of Jews should have become a refuge to their compatriots in all the lands where they were persecuted so cruelly, and at the same time established themselves as the most effective fighting force in the area. I am sure America would not stand by and see them overwhelmed by Russian weapons, especially if we had persuaded them to hold their hand while their chance remained."

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 9 pts

Apparently Churchill felt this was worth having an estimated total of 70–85 million people perish, or about 3% of the 1940 world population, even though Hitler offered peace multiple times to England, as early as 1940, when Germany had nothing to lose and was an unstoppable machine.

[–] 4 pts

Germany offered this at least three times to end WWI. The allies refused. Then the Balfour Declaration brought America into the war.

[–] 2 pts

Churchill was way more incompetent than chamberlain.

I knew the game was rigged when I read that Churchill replaced Chamberlain.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

I loathe to recall how we were made to respect this fat, dimwitted, zionist pig. At least his crimes against Germany are being paid for now.

[–] 3 pts

"Randolph Churchill, (1849-1895), politician

The father of Winston Churchill was an intimate of the Rothschild family. He formed a close association with Nathaniel, 1st Lord Rothschild, on whose behalf he reported on the development of the mining industry in South Africa. Churchill was a frequent guest at Rothschild houses. The Rothschilds made extensive loans to Churchill."

https://www.rothschildarchive.org/business/rothschild_clients/

[–] 2 pts

Yes, and Winston admired and wanted to be his dad. So bad. He rode his fathers coat tails for all he could.

[+] [deleted] 3 pts
[–] 2 pts

I am reading Walking with Churchill currently. Hes a HUGE fucking Zionist. There's no hiding it. He was proud of it. The thing that gets me, would he have pulled England into war, any war if he wasn't?

I vaguely recall reading a while ago that he, allegedly, had an uncontrollable taste for buggering very young boys, and had been doing so since his school days. Of course, the usual suspects seem to hone in on these figures.

[–] 1 pt

Consider that two nations invaded Poland. One UK declared war on the pretense to protect Poland on the other he allied.

And in 1945 Churchill allowed Poland to be invaded and conquered by the later nation.

[–] 2 pts

There is a nice book by Ed Dutton called Churchill's Headmaster that brings some light to the topic.

[–] 2 pts

Is it for that reason that he had the defenseless citizens of the german cities bombed?

[–] 0 pt
[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

at that time, churchill and other zionist politicians misled people about zionism. they claimed there was conflict between zionism and bolshevism. zionists were the "good jews" who wanted only a homeland in palestine. bolsheviks were "bad jews" who terrorized and enslaved russia & eastern europe.
the truth is: both groups were zionist. the balfour declaration was a main part of the "n.w.o.". and bolshevism / communism is the government of the "n.w.o."