WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

312

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

In a time of lawlessness, adherence to law is pointless.

[–] 3 pts

This is why the fraud election needs to be investigated and those at the top held responsible for treason.

[–] 2 pts

For those who prefer, as I do, the , as opposed to texts that have been reformated, and maybe rewritten (we have no way of knowing) for the Internet, here it is.

[–] 0 pt

Yes, I'm the same about quotes. Thanks. It's a great work.

[–] 2 pts

I generally dislike democracy, but I believe sovereignty is derived from the opinion of 80%. If 80% of people agree on something they can initiate sovereignty, including the institution of a king or limited democracy or unlimited democracy if they are stupid enough to do it. And if 80% of people are for killing a leader that's as lawful as lawful gets, because that's an authority that supersedes the constitution and can even establish or revoke it.

[–] 0 pt

Great comment, thanks.

I'm always trying to figure it out, understand it, I was raised to believe that a democracy was sacrosanct, as most of us were.

Only in the past few years have I begun to open my eyes about it all, question things.

Let me know if you have a particular book or clip or article that you like that's along these lines, if you would.

[–] 1 pt

Democracy is easy to refute.

Democracy is mob rule, the mob is retarded and easily manipulated. Therefore democracy is retarded and easily manipulated.

[–] 1 pt

That's why jews want it, I finally figured that out.

With the 'will of the people' there are no absolutes.