WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

A teacher's job is to teach kids, HOW to think, not WHAT to think.

Christopher Columbus was himself an immigrant, his wife didn't have the same nationality as him (and neither did his mistress) and he was motivated to seek a route to East Asia by the most catastrophic act of illegal immigration (i.e. invasion), that has happened to this day: - Columbus was born in Genoa (now Italy, but at that time its own republic) and migrated for work - He was married to a Portuguese woman and had an affair with a Spanish woman - He worked for the Catholic monarchs of Spain, who had just conquered back their homeland after centuries of it having been a Muslim colony - Europeans ONLY became interested in finding alternative routes to East Asia, because their natural land route (i.e. the main strand of the Silk Road, starting in Constantinople) had been cut off by the same Islamic expansion, that had also held Spain under foreign rule for about 8 centuries at that point

The Silk Road had been a millennia old trade route between the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean. Chinese, Indians, Persians, Greeks, Romans and tons of other nations had established a trade system, that connected all three races and a variety of hundreds of cultures PEACEFULLY way before Jesus Christ was a thing. And it did benefit the Asians en route far more than the Europeans, as the Asians were usually the producers and sellers, while the Europeans were the buyers and consumers. This incredible cultural miracle was disrupted by the Islamic expansion (7th century-now), because of political changes, forced migration (non-Muslims literally fleeing through half of Eurasia to get away from Islamic rule, if they couldn't fight it) and economic war tactics.

In 1453 (i.e. 39 years before Columbus sailed), Constantinople was conquered by Muslim Turks. To understand what a devastating blow this was to European civilisation and the trade system, that had previously connected 3 continents, you need to understand, that - Constantinople was a city built in the Greek colony of "Little Asia", which you may know as Turkey nowadays. Greeks started to settle there approx. 4.000 years ago, so in 1453, this peninsula had been theirs for about 3.500 years and they had developed it from scratch. The city of Troy was in this area (which makes the Trojans Greek colonists, who defended themselves against an attack from their own Greek motherland in the Trojan War). - When the Romans took over, they made Constantinople a very important city (because of its role in the Silk Road trade), that became their new capital, when Rome was destroyed in 476 AD. It's also known as Eastern Rome or Second Rome and stood for the unbroken tradition of Roman civilisation (753 BC, starting as a kingdom-1453 AD, falling as an empire = 2206 years). Constantinople's fall marked the true end of the Roman Empire and gave way to 500+ years of Ottoman (= Turkish) wars in the region, that went along with Islam conquering the European Balkan area and making it as far north as to Vienna, so Austrian, German and Polish knights had to stop it. The Islamisation of the Balkan still causes problems, but the most recent larger conflicts are the Yugoslavian wars from the 1990s on. It also came with a vast slave trade: The English word "slave" derives from Slav - because Muslim slave hunters in Eastern Europe and southern Russia kidnapped so many Slavic people that their name became a synonym for slaves! This could well have been the end of European civilisation.

Cut off from the Silk Road, the Portuguese had already tried to find a sea route around Africa (because the Suez Canal wasn't a thing yet) before Columbus sailed, which kicked off the whole European Age of Exploration. The Spanish followed, then other European nations. So, to put this in perspective: Europeans would have stayed the eff at home and minded their own business, if Islam had left the Silk Road untouched and functional. It was the fall of Constantinople (as a part of aggressive illegal Turkish immigration), that caused the European Age of Exploration. You can thank Islam for Columbus; he didn't even know where exactly he was going and most definitely didn't plan to commit genocide, when he started in Spain.


When did the English monarchy go into debt with jewish usury?

A teacher's job is to teach kids, HOW to think, not WHAT to think. Christopher Columbus was himself an immigrant, his wife didn't have the same nationality as him (and neither did his mistress) and he was motivated to seek a route to East Asia by the most catastrophic act of illegal immigration (i.e. invasion), that has happened to this day: - Columbus was born in Genoa (now Italy, but at that time its own republic) and migrated for work - He was married to a Portuguese woman and had an affair with a Spanish woman - He worked for the Catholic monarchs of Spain, who had just conquered back their homeland after centuries of it having been a Muslim colony - Europeans ONLY became interested in finding alternative routes to East Asia, because their natural land route (i.e. the main strand of the Silk Road, starting in Constantinople) had been cut off by the same Islamic expansion, that had also held Spain under foreign rule for about 8 centuries at that point The Silk Road had been a millennia old trade route between the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean. Chinese, Indians, Persians, Greeks, Romans and tons of other nations had established a trade system, that connected all three races and a variety of hundreds of cultures PEACEFULLY way before Jesus Christ was a thing. And it did benefit the Asians en route far more than the Europeans, as the Asians were usually the producers and sellers, while the Europeans were the buyers and consumers. This incredible cultural miracle was disrupted by the Islamic expansion (7th century-now), because of political changes, forced migration (non-Muslims literally fleeing through half of Eurasia to get away from Islamic rule, if they couldn't fight it) and economic war tactics. In 1453 (i.e. 39 years before Columbus sailed), Constantinople was conquered by Muslim Turks. To understand what a devastating blow this was to European civilisation and the trade system, that had previously connected 3 continents, you need to understand, that - Constantinople was a city built in the Greek colony of "Little Asia", which you may know as Turkey nowadays. Greeks started to settle there approx. 4.000 years ago, so in 1453, this peninsula had been theirs for about 3.500 years and they had developed it from scratch. The city of Troy was in this area (which makes the Trojans Greek colonists, who defended themselves against an attack from their own Greek motherland in the Trojan War). - When the Romans took over, they made Constantinople a very important city (because of its role in the Silk Road trade), that became their new capital, when Rome was destroyed in 476 AD. It's also known as Eastern Rome or Second Rome and stood for the unbroken tradition of Roman civilisation (753 BC, starting as a kingdom-1453 AD, falling as an empire = 2206 years). Constantinople's fall marked the true end of the Roman Empire and gave way to 500+ years of Ottoman (= Turkish) wars in the region, that went along with Islam conquering the European Balkan area and making it as far north as to Vienna, so Austrian, German and Polish knights had to stop it. The Islamisation of the Balkan still causes problems, but the most recent larger conflicts are the Yugoslavian wars from the 1990s on. It also came with a vast slave trade: The English word "slave" derives from Slav - because Muslim slave hunters in Eastern Europe and southern Russia kidnapped so many Slavic people that their name became a synonym for slaves! This could well have been the end of European civilisation. Cut off from the Silk Road, the Portuguese had already tried to find a sea route around Africa (because the Suez Canal wasn't a thing yet) before Columbus sailed, which kicked off the whole European Age of Exploration. The Spanish followed, then other European nations. So, to put this in perspective: Europeans would have stayed the eff at home and minded their own business, if Islam had left the Silk Road untouched and functional. It was the fall of Constantinople (as a part of aggressive illegal Turkish immigration), that caused the European Age of Exploration. You can thank Islam for Columbus; he didn't even know where exactly he was going and most definitely didn't plan to commit genocide, when he started in Spain. ------- When did the English monarchy go into debt with jewish usury?

(post is archived)

[–] 10 pts (edited )

I understand why you made that statement. However, . I make an argument against fiat and why it's evil. You actually touched on my reason at the end of your post. Also, the East India Company was instrumental in your premise too. History is fascinating, isn't it.

A teacher's job is to teach kids, HOW to think, not WHAT to think.

In a free society, yes. In a corrupt and subverted society, teachers are propaganda and they further subvert society by inculcating the youth with the despot's mind control.

[–] 4 pts

Gold puts the brakes on state spending. Fiat currency allows unrestrained spending, and thus the ability to suck more and more productive resources from the free market to be wasted on destructive state programs, always doomed.

[–] 2 pts

Fiat currency is the root of modern society's ills..

I totally agree. Usury is the root of evil. Christ fought it 2000 years ago. We are still dealing with it now.

[–] 0 pt

Not mine, took it from a YouTube comment.

[–] 4 pts

I call bullshit. Europeans would have still explored and conquered the world because of the Faustian Spirit. And "Islam is the cause of the worlds problems" in this context is a round about way of saying the resultant European Exploration is the cause of the worlds problems.

[–] 5 pts

All of this to still harp on about white Europeans still being the bad guys. Islam encroaching on everyone's trade routes made us go white up another continent with our evil evil whiteness. We would have just stayed at home if Islam didn't give us a reason to unleash our blight upon the new world.

[–] 5 pts

The difference is Europeans built while semites destroyed.

[–] 4 pts

The statement presupposes Europeans coming to the Americas was a bad thing. Which obviously it's not since nearly all the cool shit since was discovered in the Americas by Europeans.

[–] 3 pts

Cool jewish spin on history to hide the nose. This is garbage.

[–] 0 pt

Hey, the jews swooped in to "lend" "money" to the Europeans to fund wars and exploration!

Not my comment, BTW. Found on YT.

[–] 0 pt

And why are you browsing (((youtube))) reading the (((comments))) believing the (((comments))) and posting them as factual history on poal?

[–] 0 pt

it was an anti-SJW video about "TikTok Historians" which was both hilarious and frightening, and this actually is - as best we can tell from historical documents - factually true. Just because it left out some facts about other related history doesn't make it bad. Remember, thee muslims conquered, subjugated, and enslaved everyone, including jews. The jews saw an opportunity to do what they do because of these events.

[–] 3 pts

-jews are a bigger problem

-Columbus almost certainly was a cryptojew, i.e. 'Marrano'.

[–] 3 pts

Well written. Eventually with navigational and ship building advances it's quite possible the Swedes and Danes would have settled the new world. But they had problems with a famine which set them back generations as entire colonies starved out on the west coast of Iceland.

[–] 5 pts

They travelled further to Greenland and Eastern Canada around 1000. Look up "Vinland"

[–] 1 pt

My bad. I got Greenland and Iceland mixed up. You are correct. The two western colonies I referred to were on the western coast of Greenland. I think they really thought of "Vinland" as a place to pick up timber and grapes along with fur rather than any intention of creating a permanent settlement which is a pity. If only circumstances had allowed them the opportunity to explore further south on the New World continent.

[–] 1 pt

It's a real shame, to be honest.

[–] 3 pts

You misspelled "judaism."

[–] 3 pts

Columbus was a Jew

[–] 2 pts

You can thank Islam for Columbus

Columbus was a jew who left Europe the night before jews were to be expelled. He sailed the old routes of the Phoenicians and the occult masters of the day knew exactly where he was headed.

[–] 0 pt

Columbus was a jew

That is an obvious lie. No jew would ever have the courage to set off the way that he did. You are a kike liar trying to take credit for the White Man's accomplishments.

[–] 0 pt

Where's the evidence that these Phoenicians made it to the New World?

[–] 0 pt

There is evidence of white men with red or gold hair and blue eyes at the foundation of every civilization around the world. If you search, you'll find it. Robert Sepehr is a jew it seems but his Bitchute channel has a ton of information on suppressed anthropology. If you don't like him you can look into his sources.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Sepehr is a jew?? Is ANYONE informed about the past NOT a fucking jew? Jesus fuck.

[–] 1 pt

Columbus was a jew.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

Yes everything is connected. With that said it wasn't wrong for our ancestors to survive nor to thrive. There is no need for an explanation nor an apology for what they did. That doesn't mean we always have to repeat it, but I'm certainly not sorry that they survived.

With that said, the Greeks were certainly late arrivals to Asia minor on antiquity. It had been occupied by another group of indo Europeans for millennia before they arrived these were the luwians. These were also the people of Troy and a large chunk of the conglomeration that was the sea peoples, which caused the bronze age collapse. Of course there are others, all IE to my knowledge. Armenians, hittites, Phrygians etc. But the luwians are the important ones and there is a reason they were deleted from history.

[–] 0 pt

Fall of Constantinople is 1 of the darkest days in the history of western civilization but also contributed to the Renaissance. Scholarly refugees ended up in Italy with a wealth of knowledge about Greco-Roman culture and history.