Once you have the infrastructure in place, nuclear energy is so stupidly cost effective that if customers would just be paying infrastructure required, it would be a fraction of a percent of what we all pay, now. Too many (((men in the middle))), though. I'm not saying it's totally true, but I will say that if it really did turn out that nuclear weapons were fake, it would have been the most amazing propaganda to keep energy very tightly controlled and super expensive and people like (((Einstein))) and (((Oppenheimer))) would have been part of the biggest con in human history. It may be such that their effectiveness and danger are greatly exaggerated. The man who complied all of the nuclear footage for the US also edited the Zapruder footage of the Kennedy assassination. The Chinese footage... where they run at the nuclear explosion with fire hoses and clearly have bogus computer rooms... those are almost certainly fake. When they first tested the explosions, they made a comparison. The US had one set of troops pile up huge amounts of TNT, as a control group, then had another group set off the bomb for the recording. The explosions were the same size... so we can now measure one versus the other. Some people say both groups were both given TNT and told the other group was the nuke group. I honestly wouldn't propose a theory, either way, but I am always on the look out, as a result. And, for sure, the footage in a lot of cases is super questionable. So, I'm not going to tell you nukes are fake... I'm more of the opinion they are just weaker than they want us to think and therefore very useful as a contributor to the tax scam that is environmentalism. Hiroshima and Nagaski are populated again. They are not nuclear wastelands.