> 'For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,' Roberts said in a curt statement issued by the Supreme Court. 'The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.' I hate to say it, but Roberts is correct in this instance. That said, the judge in question has no standing to review or impede the deportation flights, so it's a moot point. There's no way an impeachment would proceed to a conviction.