Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

561

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

When I moved off to Mint, I saw Fedora had this in the pipe and specifically chose to avoid it for that reason. Wayland is still coming along, but it's not there yet. That said: with it being basically forced onto a red hat distro, it's gonna mature very quickly.

[–] • 2 pts

WAYLAND is just a pile of crap like systemd

made to create a mess and make linux comparable to windoze

use devuan.org

[–] • 1 pt

Idk, Alpine is sexy - musl, OpenRC and busybox vs libc, systemd and GNU coreutils.

[–] • 1 pt

No thanks, X still enjoys wide application support and is easier to write code against. Plus I'm waiting on the X12 project to get off the ground.

[–] • 0 pt

Maybe the kernel should take some of that millions and put it into something like a new X like enough cash to pay some real dev full time salaries for a few years to get it off the ground or even done in that time. Just leave out phones and other shit from the project that will over complicate it without a real return.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Unfortunately the X Consortium is responsible for all of that, and all they have managed to do was upgrade X to be compatible with modern hardware. No code cleanups, bug bounties, optimizations, etc. Someone needs to light a fire under their asses and of course back it up with programmers and funding. The time is ripe, as the Wayland group can't stop infighting and arguing over features that have been a standard part of GUIs since the 1990s - FFS how long can someone argue AGAINST having multi-window apps? Don't even get me started on the autism of GNOME and their hateboner against server-side decorations.

[–] • 1 pt

but gnome is antifa and antifa are gay for self decoration like nobody's business. As for multiwindow apps then they must hate gimp when it's not in single window mode.