WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

773

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

he’s made smart choices by casting women in roles occupied by men in Asimov’s original. In fact, two Black women are at the forefront of this story

It’s thrilling to see to Black women anchor the narrative

Good Lord. Pander more you SJW fucktard. Nina Metz, probably a fucking kike.

[–] 2 pts

I watched the first episode. One of the people replaced by a young black woman wasn't even human. They had to have made her immortal as well, since R. Daneel Olivaw was present for the >1,000 years spanning the series.

It's amazing when robots are patriarchy-adjacent.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

Wasn't Asimov and his son involved in a Hollywood pedophile operation?

He got away with it though thanks to Robert Muller, which pretty much guarantees it's part of a Mossad blackmail operation.

https://archive.is/fe9Ms

These people just can't help themselves can they?

[–] 1 pt

This story on Asimov's son was done in 1998, long before possessing images and videos of child porn was considered the big deal it is considered to be today. Mere possession was a misdemeanor, as the author of the article mentions. This was back when the Internet was the wild, wild West.

[–] 3 pts

Nobody will be happy. The books are worth reading, but they try to teach us that secret societies are the good ones (Asimov was most likely one of them). There will be no film adaption without a political message.

[–] 3 pts

I watched the first three episodes. They are well done, but as usual, too many women, too many niggers. Foundation was Asimov's first big novel. It was followed by two sequels, Foundation and Empire and Second Foundation. I first read the trilogy when I was 13. I found it a bit dry and lacking in action, but where it shines is in its intriguing concepts. Psychohistory almost seems as if it could be a real field of study. The idea of protecting the knowledge of civilization against a coming Dark Age of ignorance and war seems particularly meaningful today, even more so than when Asimov wrote the novels.

[–] 0 pt

I enjoyed the tie in to the robot series.

[–] 2 pts

The books were solid jew propaganda. It's really a trilogy about the deep state and elites reconstructing themselves, after being pushed out of power by the destruction that they caused the first time they were in charge of the galaxy. Psychohistory is just a code word for jew think.

[–] 1 pt

Sounds like the kikes and their "intergenerational Holocaust trauma"

I watched HG Wells 'The Shape of Things To Come' the other day and it's got similar themes. The line that pricked my ears was that 'war stimulates progress' and that the Freemasons can only build a socialist utopia once the current human civilization has been levelled.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Asimov was a Khazar jew. Albeit a very smart one. I would be lying if I didn't admit finding his books entertaining when I was young. But in retrospect he could not help bringing his jewish mindset to his writing.

The Mule is a fascinating character. Historical revisionism denies the effect of "Great Men," but the Mule contradicts this assessment. Great men like Hitler are forever popping up and foiling the schemers plans. They are the bane of the elite plotters. Of course Asimov has to denigrate such an individual. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPU6GVfSmVg

[–] 0 pt

It's more of a secret society propaganda, restoring the center of power after the dark ages caused by Protestants.

[–] 1 pt

More pozzed than Asimov after a blood transfusion.