![Noooo, not our precious shitskins! [919x1024 - 133KB]](https://files.catbox.moe/yppxtv.jpg){kind=link}
No, youre not a soldier, youre a beta faggot that owns a gun that you cant even shoot properly or maintain.
No, youre not a soldier, youre a beta faggot that owns a gun that you cant even shoot properly or maintain.
What "ethnic" neighbors are these faggots babbling about? I'm assuming muzzies due to the current bs in afghan. Do these retards believe thier ethnic neighbors will protect them when thier muzzie brotherhood sound the drums of war?!
What "ethnic" neighbors are these faggots babbling about? I'm assuming muzzies due to the current bs in afghan.
Do these retards believe thier ethnic neighbors will protect them when thier muzzie brotherhood sound the drums of war?!
Pretty much all of this sort of faggotry is derived from a single irrational notion: When the time comes, they think they will be spared by their pets.
“No! No what are you doing?? I’m on YOUR side!”
Pretty much all of this sort of faggotry is derived from a single irrational notion: When the time comes, they think they will be spared by their pets.
“No! No what are you doing?? I’m on YOUR side!”
Exactly. Fucking idiots.
Exactly.
Fucking idiots.
The obvious assessment of this outlandish story is that the author of that text is yanking the chain of reddit posters by trying to be even more absurd than they are.
In the land of absurdity were you are not allowed to disagree, then agree whole heatedly and agree to an absurd extreme.
Now the reddit readers are thinking this whole thing has gone wacked out too far.
How far do you think the author would have gotten by trying to argue that Trump was not Hilter and that open boarders were a bad idea? Or that we should protect our own people first.
The obvious assessment of this outlandish story is that the author of that text is yanking the chain of reddit posters by trying to be even more absurd than they are.
In the land of absurdity were you are not allowed to disagree, then agree whole heatedly and agree to an absurd extreme.
Now the reddit readers are thinking this whole thing has gone wacked out too far.
How far do you think the author would have gotten by trying to argue that Trump was not Hilter and that open boarders were a bad idea? Or that we should protect our own people first.
There should be a term for this.
I see this strategy enacted in some mainstream forums and it sort of works because leftists are so deranged already that the "absurd" parody shit-posts and trolling accounts are just a hair-line away and often crossover with what leftists type.
There should be a term for this.
I see this strategy enacted in some mainstream forums and it sort of works because leftists are so deranged already that the "absurd" parody shit-posts and trolling accounts are just a hair-line away and often crossover with what leftists type.
Scott Adams has spoken about this concept when to comes to situations where you are not allowed to disagree.
I think he used terms such as "Enthusiastic Agreement" and "Enthusiastically Agree."
Scott Adams has spoken about this concept when to comes to situations where you are not allowed to disagree.
I think he used terms such as "Enthusiastic Agreement" and "Enthusiastically Agree."
Cheese maker actually sounds like a nice job.
Cheese maker actually sounds like a nice job.
It's actually pretty interesting. If you'd like to get into it as a hobby I'd suggest watching a guy named Gavin Webber on the jewtubes.
It's actually pretty interesting. If you'd like to get into it as a hobby I'd suggest watching a guy named Gavin Webber on the jewtubes.
Actually.. The cheesemaker originated on Reddit.
This guy is just copying pasting.
How do you guys not remember thr cheesemaker?
Actually.. The cheesemaker originated on Reddit.
This guy is just copying pasting.
How do you guys not remember thr cheesemaker?
(post is archived)