WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

I’d say liberals don’t know what it means to protect children. I don’t believe this is at all an example of “big government” which is what I suppose the content insinuates.

What say you?

I’d say liberals don’t know what it means to protect children. I don’t believe this is at all an example of “big government” which is what I suppose the content insinuates. What say you?

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

"This level of gyno-idiocy is why we need to repeal the 19th amendment."

[–] 3 pts

She says what math, like theres more than 1.

[–] 2 pts

No you can do all that to your kids, we dont want it forced on our kids.

[–] 2 pts

rewrite it and reverse the parties.

[–] 1 pt

"Yes, republicans like having a say in how their kids are raised. Changing youth sporting rules isn't on our agenda; age of consent/marriage laws isn't either."

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Funny, public schooling isn't mandated, which is where many of her complaints take place...

[–] 1 pt

The rights of children are restricted by law.