I'm beginning to think Bill is purposefully conjuring a future wherein he's a hero, just like this "docu-series" depicts...
Is he memeing reality?
Fucken timing...
First THE PIRBRIGHT INSTITUTE had that weaker version of the coronavirus patented https://patents.justia.com/patent/10130701
>The Institute is strategically funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, part of UK Research and Innovation (BBSRC UKRI) and also receives funding from many other organisations including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The patented work was not funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. More information on The Livestock Antibody Hub which is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is available on our website.
Then, you get that simulation where 65 million die from corona virus, 3 months ago
by "Eric Toner, a scientist at the Johns Hopkins Centre for Health Security", who also happens to be financed by you guessed it
>In October 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted a pandemic tabletop exercise called Event 201 with partners, the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Recently, the Center for Health Security has received questions about whether that pandemic exercise predicted the current novel coronavirus outbreak in China. To be clear, the Center for Health Security and partners did not make a prediction during our tabletop exercise. For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction. Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic. We are not now predicting that the nCoV-2019 outbreak will** kill 65 million people**. Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus, the inputs we used for modeling the potential impact of that fictional virus are not similar to nCoV-2019.
And now this... Gates the netflix hero
Why not, maybe that's just a coincidence
"not similar to nCoV-2019"
And shit stops there, in the link above
...
My question is; how bad?
"mock novel coronavirus" weaker? Much weaker? Or stronger than this one?
From the ZH article above:
>He commented: “I have thought for a long time that the most likely virus that might cause a new pandemic would be a coronavirus.” As of now, the outbreak is not a pandemic, but it has been reported in eight different countries. Toner's simulation said that nearly "every country in the world" would have the virus after six months.
>He commented:“We don’t yet know how contagious it is. We know that it is being spread person to person, but we don’t know to what extent. An initial first impression is that this is significantly milder than SARS So that’s reassuring. On the other hand, it may be more transmissible than SARS, at least in the community setting.”
>His analysis used a fictional virus called CAPS, which would be resistant to any modern vaccine and would be deadlier than SARS. The simulation involved a virus originating in Brazil's pig farms. The outbreak started small, with farmers coming down with symptoms, before spreading to crowded and impoverished areas. The simulation also showed flights being cancelled and travel bookings falling by 45%, as people disseminated false information on social media. It also triggered a financial crisis around the globe, with global GDP falling 11% and stock markets falling 20% to 40%.
...
And this was 4 days ago, maybe more considering it's an interview from business insider
We know little about it, except odd stuffs, such as:
https://www.zerohedge.com/health/two-nasty-traits-coronavirus-typically-not-seen-together
>Dr. Dena Grayson: Having YEARS of experience developing an Ebola treatment, I was concerned about this Coronavirus Outbreak from the outset, because this coronavirus strain is very contagious, causes severe illness, and NO treatments or vaccines are available.
>Dr. Dena Grayson: Unlike H5N1 "bird flu" (which does not spread easily between people) or SARS (which was spread by only a handful of "super spreaders"), this coronavirus DOES appear to spread easily between people, even after making the jump from an animal (this is not common).
>Dr. Dena Grayson: In addition to being highly contagious, this novel coronavirus can cause a SEVERE infection that can kill even healthy people. It's rare to see BOTH of these (bad) attributes in the same novel virus. Usually, it's one or the other.
And evidently, this
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/did-china-steal-coronavirus-canada-and-weaponize-it
Did China Steal Coronavirus From Canada And Weaponize It?
The Real Umbrella Corp: Wuhan Ultra Biohazard Lab Was Studying "The World's Most Dangerous Pathogens"
>As it turns out, it wasn't a joke, because moments ago it was brought to our attention that in February 2017, Nature penned an extensive profile of what it called the "Chinese lab poised to study world's most dangerous pathogens." The location of this BSL-4 rated lab? Why, Wuhan.
...
If this is the case, if this is a bioweapon in the wild... Prepare your anus, it's not what the simulation was expecting, it's worse
i'm so tired of people who's voices are artificially amplified by money. jeeze, I'll bet bill gates takes notes on the bullshit that comes out of his own mouth. I can just imagine him in front of his bathroom mirror. "oh, that's brilliant, Billy! gotta save that for later! thanks Billy, you handsome (literal) devil!"
Due to the FED, extreme wealth is so concentrated that those with the wealth have the monetary capability of actually causing biblical looking apocalypse with either weapons and/or disease. They would love to shove a movie like that, showing them as the heroes, down our throats.
They would be so much further along if it had not been for President Donald J. Trump and his administration.
(post is archived)