It’s called the jew york times for a reason.
It’s called the jew york times for a reason.
Came so close to being a good article, but "disproven by XYZ" is not a valid reference. You have to actually reference the specific volumes, titles, page numbers, etc.
Came so close to being a good article, but "disproven by XYZ" is not a valid reference. You have to actually reference the specific volumes, titles, page numbers, etc.
They're links that lead to articles.
They're links that lead to articles.
Not when I read it. They go to other blogs and "news" sites. That's not a primary source, it's literally secondary sources.
Not when I read it. They go to other blogs and "news" sites. That's not a primary source, it's literally secondary sources.
Yellow Journalism
Yellow Journalism
Accidental
Accidental
Wasn't the new york times taken over by a Mexican? Doesn't matter it's all jew money at this point.
Wasn't the new york times taken over by a Mexican? Doesn't matter it's all jew money at this point.
Nah that’s misdirection, it’s owned by the Ochs-Sulzberger family, and they are all subversive kikes.
Nah that’s misdirection, it’s owned by the Ochs-Sulzberger family, and they are all subversive kikes.
It's part of the DNC Scare-Jump technique. They want to scare people, then have people jump on any solution offered by DNC when what people need to do is Pause-Think and analyze what really caused the problem, who is responsible, and the best choice solutions.
It's part of the DNC Scare-Jump technique. They want to scare people, then have people jump on any solution offered by DNC when what people need to do is Pause-Think and analyze what really caused the problem, who is responsible, and the best choice solutions.
It isn't exactly news that the NYT is a (((agent provocateur))), but the article is a piece of quality journalism and a read worth your while!
It isn't exactly news that the NYT is a (((agent provocateur))), but the article is a piece of quality journalism and a read worth your while!
“Our tax code isn’t progressive. It’s not even flat. For people like me—and I assume there are millions of us—it’s regressive. For many people, the more you make, the lower the rate you pay.” Disproven by facts from the Congressional Budget Office, the U.S. Treasury Department, and the left-leaning Tax Policy Center.
Eh, kind of. The people who pay the most percentage taxes are high income employees. An extreme case would be high-end professional athletes, but more commonly we'd be talking about lawyers, doctors, scientists, some engineers. These have the fewest mechanisms to avoid taxes. Business owners/self employed make more money, but they have lots of tools to avoid taxes.
So it's probably a curve that goes up from zero, peaks somewhere above the median, and decreases from there, though not reaching zero again.
> “Our tax code isn’t progressive. It’s not even flat. For people like me—and I assume there are millions of us—it’s regressive. For many people, the more you make, the lower the rate you pay.” Disproven by facts from the Congressional Budget Office, the U.S. Treasury Department, and the left-leaning Tax Policy Center.
Eh, kind of. The people who pay the most percentage taxes are high income employees. An extreme case would be high-end professional athletes, but more commonly we'd be talking about lawyers, doctors, scientists, some engineers. These have the fewest mechanisms to avoid taxes. Business owners/self employed make more money, but they have lots of tools to avoid taxes.
So it's probably a curve that goes up from zero, peaks somewhere above the median, and decreases from there, though not reaching zero again.
That was excellent!
That was excellent!
NYT's ? Really?
WTF have we been saying all this time?
Are you awake yet?
NYT's ? Really?
WTF have we been saying all this time?
Are you awake yet?
s the basic legislative authorization for propaganda activities conducted by the U.S. Department of State, sometimes called "public diplomacy"...The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, which was contained within the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (section 1078 (a)) amended the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 and the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 1987, allowing for materials produced by the State Department and the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) to be disseminated (widely spread) within the United States.[1][2]...
When the Bloom Bill (HR 4982) went to the House Rules Committee in February 1946, committee Chairman Eugene Cox (D-GA) informed Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs William B. Benton that ten of the twelve committee members were against anything the State Department favored because of its "Communist infiltration and pro-Russian policy."
[Smith–Mundt Act, i](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith%E2%80%93Mundt_Act)s the basic legislative authorization for propaganda activities conducted by the U.S. Department of State, sometimes called "public diplomacy"...The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, which was contained within the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (section 1078 (a)) amended the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 and the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 1987, allowing for materials produced by the State Department and the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) to be disseminated (widely spread) within the United States.[1][2]...
When the Bloom Bill (HR 4982) went to the House Rules Committee in February 1946, committee Chairman Eugene Cox (D-GA) informed Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs William B. Benton that **ten of the twelve committee members were against anything the State Department favored because of its "Communist infiltration** and pro-Russian policy."
(post is archived)