https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M&t=4h20m12s
Found this on conspiracies.win. It links directly to the good part.
https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M&t=4h20m12s
Found this on conspiracies.win. It links directly to the good part.
Soon the data will show the jabs actually did do far more harm than helped.
only 15.5% efficacy 7 months after jab(s) at best, and possibly 0% efficacy by month 8.
via CONFIDENTIAL eyes only, not for press, committee brief by Pfizer on total lack of efficacy, now this evening released by FDA :
(PDF): 53 pages : Pfizer BNT162b2 VRBPAC Briefing Document , September 17 2021: https://files.catbox.moe/3r3k2x.pdf
summary.... after 8 months the jabbed are in fact more susceptible, not less, to newer similar SARS-2 strains.
Page 9 and 10 in the PDF are key. (not statistically significantly different from zero) :
"Further, effectiveness estimates from 20 June 2021 to 17 July 2021 showed that VE against SARS‑CoV‑2 infections and against symptomatic COVID-19 progressively declined as time-from-vaccine increased, with individuals ≥16 years of age vaccinated in January having only 16% effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19, which was not statistically significantly different from zero.
By contrast, those who were fully vaccinated in April 2021 had 79% (60, 88) effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19. These data were interpreted by MoH officials to suggest that waning of the vaccine, and not the introduction of the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant (which became the predominant strain in July), was primarily driving declining VE estimates."
The jab also causes other hospitalization events in some people. In 1 year, the persistent lack of 40% of one form of T-Cell will start making common cancers skyrocket. (T-cells keep many cancers at bay).
Tables on cancers that T-cells normally suppress are typically online, but now offline.
US Cancer Statistics dataset for 2020 and 2021 are shoahed : United States Cancer Statistics (USCS)
https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/uscs/dataviz/download_data.htm
HPV cancers like 'Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA)' will be the one to watch in jabbed vs unjabbed.
and 'average annual percentage change (AAPC)' for next month vs last year or year before same month, though that particular cancer is volatile, so other cancers like cervical might be better to compare.
But 2019 is now offline at CDC. Shoahed due to the volcano brewing in the jabbed for cancers about to skyrocket?
Other US cancer registries exist though. As do other nations.
Though not one web site ANYWHERE on entire internet, and not one news article yet, my prophecy of rising cancers in jabbed will become true and major news, and its not because I am a time traveler from the future.
Also, the FDA can overrule their own committee vote, and likely will for the (((executive branch))) and (((house of representatives)))
N O SHIT!!!!
Thanks for explaining the bloody obvious!
The point is, is if this does not reach the fucking stupid sheep out there, what is the point. Your preaching to the choir here.
Assuming israel got the same jab they're pushing in White countries, GOOD.
*Not taking the Jab. We don't know the long terms affects of these vaccines. Those not taking the jab are viewed as the scum of the earth. **
I'm sorry, but i don't quite understand a miniscule detail in this; the FDA won't recommend the booster-shot because of "insufficient data"?
We're talking about the exact same concoction they want everybody to suffer two times, right?
(post is archived)