WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

629

Devra Davis Ph.D., MPH founder of the Environmental Health Trust, is an epidemiologist and toxicologist as well as an author on three books on environmental hazards. She served as Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Health in the Department of Health and Human Services, was founding director of the Center for Environmental Oncology at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and former professor of epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health. As one of the lead authors on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, she was part of the team of scientists awarded the Nobel Peace Prize along with Al Gore.

Recently, Davis and her organization, Environmental Health Trust (EHT), won a victory in the U.S. Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit with a favorable judgment. In its ruling, the court found the FCC ignored scientific evidence showing harm from wireless radiation and ordered the FCC to reexamine the science on long term exposure, environmental impacts and impacts to children.

The court held that the FCC failed to respond to “record evidence that exposure to radiofrequency radiation at levels below the FCC’s current limits may cause negative health effects unrelated to cancer.” The court also said that the agency demonstrated “a complete failure to respond to comments concerning environmental harm caused by RF radiation.” The court found the FCC ignored numerous organizations, scientists, medical doctors -including the American Academy of Pediatrics -who have repeatedly called on the FCC to update its 1996 human exposure wireless limits. Thousands of pages of evidence were included in the filings.

For more than a decade, Davis has published and reviewed respected research studies that confirm the dangers of wireless radiation. She has testified to Congress on the issue and long worked with physicians, scientists, other epidemiologists and toxicologists who concur that mobile devices, Wi-Fi, 5G and other radio-frequency systems pose a health risk to humans, animals and the environment.

Associating Cell Phone Radiation To Cancer Cell phones were not premarket safety tested before they came on the market in the 80s because they were assumed to be safe. However, in 2011 the World Health Organization concluded cell phone radiation was a “possible” carcinogen based on findings of brain cancer in studies of people who use cell phones heavily for many years.

Since that time, the evidence has significantly increased associating cell phone radiation to cancer and many experts conclude cell phone radiation is a human carcinogen. In addition, numerous well-documented scientific research studies have demonstrated that cell phone radiation can impact reproductive organs and the brain.

Hugh S. Taylor, M.D. is president of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. He is professor and chair of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at Yale School of Medicine and chief of obstetrics and gynecology at Yale-New Haven Hospital. He has also been trying to educate the public on the dangers of wireless radiation. His research findings have been pivotal in demonstrating harm from wireless radiation exposure particularly prenatal exposure. “We need to act now,” said Taylor. “If I were someone who’s considering pregnancy, or someone who is pregnant or the mother of a young child, I think it’s just important to move that cell phone away from you and not be exposed to that radiation any more than possible.”

“The FCC must update it’s 25 year-old safety limits for wireless radiation from cell phones, cell towers and wireless devices. The fact that the U.S. Court of Appeals ordered the FCC to explain why it has ignored years of scientific research that demonstrates harm from radiation is a critical step in the right direction,” said Davis who argues that the FCC’s outdated limits place Americans everywhere at risk, especially in the era of 5G.

“We submitted thousands of pages of peer-reviewed, published scientific data to the FCC over the last several years documenting the need for health agencies to create safety limits that protect against biological effects. Infrastructure policy should prioritize safe wired broadband rather than wireless networks in order to reduce public exposure,” Davis added. “Unfortunately, the telecom industry is now pushing millions of new 5G wireless antennas into neighborhoods and billions of new wireless devices putting more people in harm’s way every day.”

“The research demonstrates long term exposure can lead to serious health effects,” Davis explained. “Unfortunately, we don’t have the luxury of time to wait for the public to realize the dangers are real.”

Environmental Health Trust, a 501(c)3 nonprofit, is a think tank that promotes a healthier environment through research, education and policy.

For more information on the Environmental Health Trust, go to www.ehtrust.org.

Devra Davis Ph.D., MPH founder of the Environmental Health Trust, is an epidemiologist and toxicologist as well as an author on three books on environmental hazards. She served as Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Health in the Department of Health and Human Services, was founding director of the Center for Environmental Oncology at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and former professor of epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health. As one of the lead authors on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, she was part of the team of scientists awarded the Nobel Peace Prize along with Al Gore. Recently, Davis and her organization, Environmental Health Trust (EHT), won a victory in the U.S. Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit with a favorable judgment. In its ruling, the court found the FCC ignored scientific evidence showing harm from wireless radiation and ordered the FCC to reexamine the science on long term exposure, environmental impacts and impacts to children. The court held that the FCC failed to respond to “record evidence that exposure to radiofrequency radiation at levels below the FCC’s current limits may cause negative health effects unrelated to cancer.” The court also said that the agency demonstrated “a complete failure to respond to comments concerning environmental harm caused by RF radiation.” The court found the FCC ignored numerous organizations, scientists, medical doctors -including the American Academy of Pediatrics -who have repeatedly called on the FCC to update its 1996 human exposure wireless limits. Thousands of pages of evidence were included in the filings. For more than a decade, Davis has published and reviewed respected research studies that confirm the dangers of wireless radiation. She has testified to Congress on the issue and long worked with physicians, scientists, other epidemiologists and toxicologists who concur that mobile devices, Wi-Fi, 5G and other radio-frequency systems pose a health risk to humans, animals and the environment. Associating Cell Phone Radiation To Cancer Cell phones were not premarket safety tested before they came on the market in the 80s because they were assumed to be safe. However, in 2011 the World Health Organization concluded cell phone radiation was a “possible” carcinogen based on findings of brain cancer in studies of people who use cell phones heavily for many years. Since that time, the evidence has significantly increased associating cell phone radiation to cancer and many experts conclude cell phone radiation is a human carcinogen. In addition, numerous well-documented scientific research studies have demonstrated that cell phone radiation can impact reproductive organs and the brain. Hugh S. Taylor, M.D. is president of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. He is professor and chair of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at Yale School of Medicine and chief of obstetrics and gynecology at Yale-New Haven Hospital. He has also been trying to educate the public on the dangers of wireless radiation. His research findings have been pivotal in demonstrating harm from wireless radiation exposure particularly prenatal exposure. “We need to act now,” said Taylor. “If I were someone who’s considering pregnancy, or someone who is pregnant or the mother of a young child, I think it’s just important to move that cell phone away from you and not be exposed to that radiation any more than possible.” “The FCC must update it’s 25 year-old safety limits for wireless radiation from cell phones, cell towers and wireless devices. The fact that the U.S. Court of Appeals ordered the FCC to explain why it has ignored years of scientific research that demonstrates harm from radiation is a critical step in the right direction,” said Davis who argues that the FCC’s outdated limits place Americans everywhere at risk, especially in the era of 5G. “We submitted thousands of pages of peer-reviewed, published scientific data to the FCC over the last several years documenting the need for health agencies to create safety limits that protect against biological effects. Infrastructure policy should prioritize safe wired broadband rather than wireless networks in order to reduce public exposure,” Davis added. “Unfortunately, the telecom industry is now pushing millions of new 5G wireless antennas into neighborhoods and billions of new wireless devices putting more people in harm’s way every day.” “The research demonstrates long term exposure can lead to serious health effects,” Davis explained. “Unfortunately, we don’t have the luxury of time to wait for the public to realize the dangers are real.” Environmental Health Trust, a 501(c)3 nonprofit, is a think tank that promotes a healthier environment through research, education and policy. For more information on the Environmental Health Trust, go to www.ehtrust.org.

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

Devra Lee Davis was born June 7, 1946 in Washington, D.C., to Harry and Jean Langer Davis ... Raised in a Jewish family, as a child she briefly considered becoming a rabbi.

LOL

[–] 0 pt

And it's a cohencidence... Nice catch

[–] 6 pts

As one of the lead authors on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, she was part of the team of scientists awarded the Nobel Peace Prize along with Al Gore.

wtf does climate change have to do with medicine

[–] 5 pts (edited )

That single sentence ruins everything connected to it indeed

That's why I posted it in "news" while I could have picked "health" or "technology"

It's not neutral to say the least, it automatically brings an entire different perspective on the topic, a political one

[–] 2 pts

Didn't you know? All those soccer players dying of heart attacks this year was caused by climate change. The climate changed a few months ago and BOOM young athletes suddenly all have heart disease.

[–] 1 pt

It's proof she's lying. Stooges for Marxist watermelons are always liars.

[+] [deleted] 2 pts
[–] 1 pt

radiation is always fucking us though, the sun is a double edged sword.

Now if it's more than your body can fix by itself, then I have a problem.

Why do I get the feeling all the people about to get cancer from the shots are gonna be scape goated for some wifi 5G bullshit?

[–] 1 pt

So a climate change stooge (read: Marxist liar) claimed this was "evidence" of non-ionizing radiation causing cancer?

The court held that the FCC failed to respond to “record evidence that exposure to radiofrequency radiation at levels below the FCC’s current limits may cause negative health effects unrelated to cancer.” The court also said that the agency demonstrated “a complete failure to respond to comments concerning environmental harm caused by RF radiation.”

If the FCC "failed to respond" to claims that witches turned me into a newt, it wouldn't be evidence of witchcraft. It'd be evidence that my claim is bullshit and the FCC has better things to do than argue with retards.

Non-ionizing radiation cannot cause cancer. If the power level is high enough to cause any harm at all, it'll be in the form of very obvious, very immediate burns because you decided to stand a foot in front of naval radar or hopped the fence and climbed an AM radio tower.

I worked for years as a RF Engineer. This is basic physics.

[–] 1 pt

"may cause negative health effects unrelated to cancer". In these papers these effects are the anecdotal claims of "dizziness", "nausea", "insomnia", etc.. that haven't been empirically tested in a repeatable manner. Where is the study results that measured the "nausea" in a controlled double blind test? They moved away from claiming cancer as we have now been exposed to these frequencies for entire lifetimes and there is no long term cancer development shown.

[–] 1 pt

Those sound like the go-to symptoms for psychosomatic conditions since they're all impossible to test and can be caused by anything from indigestion to reading the newspaper.

[–] 0 pt

you sayin sail foams are dangerous?

[–] 0 pt

Wait until they start looking at the "smart meters" that were forcefully bolted onto peoples homes so they could automate power consumption collection.

These change the oxygen consistency of the blood.

[–] 1 pt

Those are just 3g/4g modems that are the same as in your cel phone.

You can buy them off the shelf for hobby projects like the Raspberry Pi here: https://sixfab.com/product/raspberry-pi-3g-4glte-base-shield-v2/

It's not uncommon for kids to be playing with stuff like this building things.

I once had a long wave radio enthusiast blow away my wifi signal in a particular location because he liked to fuck with people. Took a while to figure that one out, but, this technology is out there. Your neighbour could be pointing a directional wifi device to you right now, or a neighbours kid could be building a radioactive device out of bits and pieces they collected around town.

[–] 1 pt

No. Around here the smart meters are RF - UHF/VHF.

[–] 2 pts

So you're saying that CB radios and walkie talkies have been killing us for almost a century and we only noticed when they hooked one up to a power meter at 1/100th the power?

[–] 0 pt

Ah, I stand corrected. Aren't those lower power than 3g/4g modems?