WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

358

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

8 people in hospital in the entire country. 70 percent are vaccinated. 14 percent are unvaxxed and 14 percent are unknown. Seems pretty obvious that more vaccinated people are in hospital. They did at least admit that 8 people is not enough data to extrapolate. Then they extrapolated the shit out of it come to the conclusion that vax is better. Also, the "expert" doing the math is a Geology Professor from Oregon. He seems pretty far out of his lane. People fail to make the connection that the higher the degree only means they have great knowledge about an ever narrowing subject. Having a PhD doesn't make someone smarter than everyone else in everything.

[–] 0 pt

The math depends on how many are vaccinated. If more than 70% are vaccinated then it means the hospitalization rate for the vaxxed is less than for the unvaxxed. Likewise, if less than 70% are jabbed it means the reverse.

[–] 0 pt

What? They are all hospitalized and we must assume the primary reason is COVID as it is not stated in the article. If 70% of the sick people are vaxxed, that is almost 3 times more than the unvaccinated. The study was on a group of only 8 people in the hospital which is a BS sample. 6 were vaccinated, 1 was unvaccinated and 1 was unknown. 6 is more than 1.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

What? They are all hospitalized and we must assume the primary reason is COVID as it is not stated in the article. If 70% of the sick people are vaxxed, that is almost 3 times more than the unvaccinated.

Say you have 80 vaccinated people and 20 unvaccinated people with the rona, and 50 people in the hospital. If 70% of those in the hospital are vaccinated, it means there are 35 vaccinated and 15 unvaccinated in the hospital. That's a hospitalization rate of 35 / 80 = 43.75% for vaccinated people and 15 / 25 = 60% for unvaccinated.

[–] 2 pts

Dr Leighton Watson, an Auckland-based geophysicist and mathematician with the University of Oregon, said while the question may seem confronting at face value, it’s actually just a mathematical error.

Well if there are only 8 people in the hospital suffering from "The deadliest disease known to man," then why are we worrying about it? There probably more (population adjusted) in the hospital here in the states suffering from cigarette related issues.

[–] 2 pts

They'll just tell you that their totalitarianism is the reason there's nothing to worry about.

[–] 1 pt

We are here to protect you from the terrible secret of space.

[–] 1 pt

I am going to drive my space travel modified, turbo charged rocket van off of the edge of the flat Earth and navigate the universe bro.

[–] 1 pt

Or cancer, or beetus or alcohol related issues. Or heart issues. Or kidney issues... the list goes on.. and all much more deadly than the coronaronadingdong.

[–] 1 pt

That's HUGE.

[–] 0 pt

Not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing. Commies are mighty shifty...they could of taken over the MSM just to undermine the First Amendment by discrediting the press.

[–] 1 pt

My issue is I can't tell which is faker.. msm, the Xiden administration or coronaronadingdong?

Oh yeah.. all 3 are. No wonder I'm confused pondering this.

[–] 1 pt

When I retire I'm taking up journalism . I mean shit , just asking politicians basic questions , and not letting them dodge answering isn't hard , but nobody seems to really do it anymore

[–] 0 pt

>Dr Leighton Watson, an Auckland-based geophysicist and mathematician..

I'm always thankful for a laymans insightful commentary..

[–] 0 pt

Unless they misled the American public for years on end, we should not hang them all..

[–] 0 pt

I miss .

That’s why they are about to pull the “world war” ripcord.

You’ll have to pay attention to them if the “world is at war.”

[–] 0 pt

I would rather have a cgi talking head a la Max Headroom over the media now.

Load more (1 reply)