WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

342

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 5 pts

I suppose that includes 100% factual accounts like USS Liberty, Gulf of Tonkin, Kennedy assassination, CIA and drug running, 9/11, January 6th, CCP owning certain politicians, etc., etc., etc.

Actually, it's difficult to impossible to talk about the government and not mention 100% provable narratives that the current administration and previous administrations would rather you did not bring up. Guess that makes me a terrorist now...

[–] 0 pt

The thing is, how fucking stupid are the jews? So now they labelled more than 50% of the entire US as terrorists, is the next step a massive civil war or something?

[–] 0 pt

Setting up for mid term shenanigans

[–] 0 pt

Thought crimes incoming- I'll stand on the first thanks

[–] 0 pt

Depends on how you emphasize the phrase. In this context I read "terrorist threat" as threats leveled against terrorists. Since the vast majority of the US Govt is composed of terrorists it is then accurate. Waco, OKC, Ruby Ridge, 9/11...need I go on?

[–] 0 pt

So, something like claiming Russia stole an election?

[–] 0 pt

"grievances"

So they admit many people have grievances not being answered or addressed.

Policies like this are just one example of such grievances.

Policies like this are liable to create terrorists.