WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

Betcha indians (dot-type) could fly a swastika and nobody'd bat an eye... y'know, since it was used by many ancient civilizations.

[–] 4 pts

I have a pic somewhere that I took at an apt. building I was working at where a dot not feather had one hanging on their door. Showed it to the manager to see what response I would get. It was a non issue.

[–] 6 pts

But a BLM flag would be praised even though they actually burned up and ruined most of that very city.

[–] 0 pt

someone would simply have to say that is offensive and they would also be evicted. No?

[–] 0 pt

Assuming the kike lawyer and kike management takes offense. In most places, tenants have so many rights. Eviction is really hard. I guess a court might fast track this one on account of insulting the chosen, but normally it takes a while.

[–] 4 pts

The person photographing the inside of an apartment at night from the outside is not a peeping tom?

[–] 0 pt

walk around naked. video them videoing you. done done.

[–] 1 pt
[–] 1 pt (edited )

Should have spray painted it on the side of the building. Only the owner gets ownership of it and he blames the Niggers. Freedom of speech only works if you are a Nigger. Aren't there peeping laws in MN? taking pictures of someone's inside of their home should constitute as peeping. looks like it's on a wall and not on the window.

[–] 0 pt

"Defendant is displaying and promoting Nazi symbols and its flag to cause fear, intimidation, and reprisal against other residents and (Sela Group)," the attorney wrote. "Defendant's conduct constitutes a nuisance and interferes with the comfort and enjoyment of other residents."

The usual shift of responsibility. The flag itself causes nothing. Sane, mature adults can deal with it without consequence. It's the people that kick people out and cause a nuisance that are a danger to others.

[–] 0 pt

Remember, it's your fault if someone decides to get offended.