Invariably, mainstream physics attempts to replicate the CTMU, but as with their Geocentrist counterparts from the last dark age period, they're hopelessly overmatched by reality itself. >*"The key idea behind our proposal is that causal relations in quantum theory correspond to influence through so-called unitary transformations—these are the types of transformations that describe the evolutions of isolated quantum systems.* Physics.org article The universe is (obviously) an isolated quantum system, meaning it (obviously) undergoes unitary transformations, which means that "spooky action at a distance" isn't mysterious whatsoever, at least not according to the logic of "isolated quantum systems". What these mainstream blockheads are doing is "isolating" the universe from "themselves". They're too dense to know or care what this mean. When science works, the entire "expert class" of scientists are proven to be *absolutely wrong*, not otherwise. Newton's theory, Einstein's theory, and Quantum Physics are all examples of mainstream scientists virtually ALL being dead wrong. We haven't had any real theories since Shannon's Theory of Information, so we've got a lot of "dead wrong" experts out there all chiming in. They're taking every last dollar of research money they can grub, without the possibility of ever developing anything akin to a "reality theory". All "experts" ever can develop is a theory where they need more research grant money to continue their research, or else they would immediately cease being "researchers" and "experts". (Do you see how this sham works?) The generic and indisputable truth about cosmic causality cycles is contained in the CTMU... >*Ordinary feedback, describing the evolution of mechanical (and with somewhat less success, biological) systems, is cyclical or recursive. The system and its components repeatedly call on internal structures, routines and actuation mechanisms in order to acquire input, generate corresponding internal information, internally communicate and process this information, and evolve to appropriate states in light of input and programming. However, where the object is to describe the evolution of a system from a state in which there is no information or programming (information-processing syntax) at all, a new kind of feedback is required: telic feedback.* >*The currency of telic feedback is a quantifiable self-selection parameter, generalized utility, a generalized property of law and state in the maximization of which they undergo mutual refinement (note that generalized utility is self-descriptive or autologous, intrinsically and retroactively defined within the system, and “pre-informational” in the sense that it assigns no specific property to any specific object). Through telic feedback, a system retroactively selfconfigures by reflexively applying a “generalized utility function” to its internal existential potential or possible futures. In effect, the system brings itself into existence as a means of atemporal communication between its past and future whereby law and state, syntax and informational content, generate and refine each other across time to maximize total systemic self-utility. This defines a situation in which the true temporal identity of the system is a distributed point of temporal equilibrium that is both between and inclusive of past and future. In this sense, the system is timeless or atemporal.* CTMU