High-energy neutrino telescopes, such as the IceCube telescope, are not only sensitive to neutrinos;
they can also be used to detect other exotic particles, including magnetic monopoles
.Magnetic monopoles are
hypothetical
elementary particles comprised of an isolated magnet with a single magnetic pole.
It's no wonder people don't take science seriously.
How much tax money was spent on detecting hypotheses?
Cherenkov radiation pffft. Heres a quote from article.
We revisit the
theory of Cherenkov radiation
in uniaxial crystals. Historically, a number of flawed attempts have been made at explaining this radiation phenomenon, anda consistent error-free description is nowhere available
.
>High-energy neutrino telescopes, such as the IceCube telescope, are not only sensitive to neutrinos; `they can also be used to detect other exotic particles, including magnetic monopoles`.
>>Magnetic monopoles are `hypothetical` elementary particles comprised of an isolated magnet with a single magnetic pole.
It's no wonder people don't take science seriously.
How much tax money was spent on detecting hypotheses?
Cherenkov radiation pffft. Heres a quote from [this](https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.053006) article.
>We revisit the `theory of Cherenkov radiation` in uniaxial crystals. Historically, a number of flawed attempts have been made at explaining this radiation phenomenon, and `a consistent error-free description is nowhere available`.
(post is archived)