Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

949

Ask Fake News MSM why.

Ask Fake News MSM why.

(post is archived)

[–] • 5 pts

I remember this.

And yet people still swallow this crap, the official story.

I'd share this with family but then they'd have to actually think and it's much easier not to.

[–] • 5 pts

Patriot, I remember this also, and a General who had the courage to say they found fins belonging to a rocket and not a plane.

[–] • 4 pts

Wow, did not hear of the rocket.

[–] • 4 pts

One of the earlier 911 docs, I think "Loose Change" had it. The only visible "plane" debris at the pentagon appeared to be from a missile. I believe they actually matched some of the visible serial numbers of the debris to actual American made missile components. All you really need to do is think about the amount bullshit u would have to accept to believe a commercial airliner hit the pentagon on 911. Hint, It's a lot.

[–] • 2 pts

Patriot, that was removed pretty fast, the general stated he was part of the investigating team.

[–] • 4 pts

I have noticed since Biden took office that the irrationality and closed-door stance to any outside information has tripled in intensity. My family members that are on board with the authorized narrative are hostile to anything that isn't mainstream news, and I am finding them growing increasingly agitated as they are forced to defend things like a transvestite deputy secretary of health.

I point out that just two or three years ago they would have considered that possibility clownish, but that today they endorse it.

Nothing changes.

The people who have not 'come across the bridge' are hopeless in my estimation. With this much commitment to nonsense, there's no real way to find your way back to sanity without a substantial cognitive remodeling.

We shouldn't think that they will undergo this unless they absolutely must. As long as they aren't starving or in physical pain, they will continue down the road they are on.

[–] • 0 pt

We shouldn't think that they will undergo this unless they absolutely must.

Exactly right.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

they'd have to actually think and it's much easier not to

as you talk to them 6 ft away while they wear their masks

[–] • 2 pts

Downloaded and saved to my local archive.

Everyone viewing this should do the same.

[–] • 1 pt

Patriot, I hope all our Patriots and Anons do the same. I suspect they will try and scrub this off the internet.

[–] • 2 pts

http://911planeshoax.com

Prob my 10th time posting it

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Really insightful article on the 911 hoax. And keep on posting it, this link can't be shared enough.

[–] • 0 pt

Patriot, I am not sure how many mire times it will take to get people to listen.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Here's another link for the video that enables you to download it. The video could be clearer, but the message is clear enough. No plane hit the pentagon.

https://gvid.tv/v/gwlsHs

[–] • 1 pt

Thank you for the link, Patriot. Hope everyone downloads this.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I remember that. At first, there was no debris field. This two big engines would still be left, even if aluminum cowels were destroyed.

And the tail would be left.

the FBI was going around collecting all security video footage from cameras in the area around the mil HQ. If it was real, wouldn't they play it in endless loops like the twin towers CGI?

Speaking of the twin towers, here is MIT report about engines in crashes: 3.3 Engines and wing damage The engines are the only components of the aircraft that can be considered approximately as rigid bodies. Their devastating power is unmatched until they encounter an object of similar weight and strength. In the experimental study in which an engine of a transport aircraft hit a thick concrete wall, the engine itself was crashed and fractured, so it was not rigid, [28]. However, in contact with less substantial members the engine could cut and plow through the various structural members of the WTC Towers until all their kinetic energy is absorbed. http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/PDFfiles/Chapter%20IV%20Aircraft%20Impact.pdf

Was there reports of the engines hitting other building down range from the twin tower impacts? The elevation alone would send those suckers pretty far.

Interesting read as it talks about shearing forces of the concrete floors on aluminum, which never occured to me.

Now the fuselage is getting engaged with one or two floors of the height w m = 0.9 o each. The floor is relatively narrow compared to the diameter of the fuselage and may in fact slice through the fuselage and cut it into two or three pieces. Wierzbicki [27] derived an approximate solution for plastic resistance of a blunt object cutting into thin sheet, such as tubular wall of the fuselage model. He identified the so-called “concertina” tearing mode, which consists of two diverging cracks enclosing a strip which progressively folds back and forth. A photograph of the damaged pattern induced by a rigid punch of width wo is shown in Figure 10.

Which means, to my very limited physics understanding, that a lot of the plane forward energy was being absorbed by the concrete floors as it peeled a hypothetical plane apart.

[–] • 0 pt

Outstanding post Patriot. Thank you, you should make a thread with this information.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

If you've ever seen a plane fuselage after getting struck by a bird in flight, the idea that the nose of that plane could remain intact after slicing through a hardened metal framed building is ludicrous.

[–] • 0 pt

A lot of folks paid attention and understood who did it in the first 72hrs.

[–] • 1 pt

Amen Patriot, I was always asking where are the plane parts. Pentagon, NYC and the field in Pa.