Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

The diapers most of us are wearing on our face most of the time apparently have no effect at stopping Covid-19. This explains a lot.

Did you hear about the peer-reviewed study done by Stanford University that demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that face masks have absolutely zero chance of preventing the spread of Covid-19? No? It was posted on the the National Center for Biological Information government website. The NCBI is a branch of the National Institute for Health, so one would think such a study would be widely reported by mainstream media and embraced by the “science-loving” folks in Big Tech.

Instead, a DuckDuckGo search reveals it was picked up by ZERO mainstream media outlets and Big Tech tyrants will suspend people who post it, as political strategist Steve Cortes learned the hard way when he posted a Tweet that went against the face mask narrative. The Tweet itself featured a quote and a link that prompted Twitter to suspend his account, potentially indefinitely.

The sentence Cortes quoted from the study’s conclusion reads: “The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks.”

Twitter messaged Cortes demanding he delete the Tweet, citing that he broke Twitter rules specifically for, “Violating the policy on spreading misleading and potentially harmful information related to COVID-19.”

Vainshelboim drew many conclusions from the vast information he compiled, but arguably the biggest bombshell in it can be found in the “Efficacy of facemasks” section [emphasis added]:

The diapers most of us are wearing on our face most of the time apparently have no effect at stopping Covid-19. This explains a lot. Did you hear about the peer-reviewed study done by Stanford University that demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that face masks have absolutely zero chance of preventing the spread of Covid-19? No? It was posted on the the National Center for Biological Information government website. The NCBI is a branch of the National Institute for Health, so one would think such a study would be widely reported by mainstream media and embraced by the “science-loving” folks in Big Tech. Instead, a DuckDuckGo search reveals it was picked up by ZERO mainstream media outlets and Big Tech tyrants will suspend people who post it, as political strategist Steve Cortes learned the hard way when he posted a Tweet that went against the face mask narrative. The Tweet itself featured a quote and a link that prompted Twitter to suspend his account, potentially indefinitely. The sentence Cortes quoted from the study’s conclusion reads: “The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks.” Twitter messaged Cortes demanding he delete the Tweet, citing that he broke Twitter rules specifically for, “Violating the policy on spreading misleading and potentially harmful information related to COVID-19.” Vainshelboim drew many conclusions from the vast information he compiled, but arguably the biggest bombshell in it can be found in the “Efficacy of facemasks” section [emphasis added]:

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

No! No! Herr Doktor Faucistein said this morning that due to not enough data so far that face diapers are more effective than the shot!

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

The virus is worse than the cure!!!! Why am I suddenly feeling ill after taking the vaccine? Nevermind socialist media will justify my virtue signalling for likes!!! I cant smell or taste anything huh that's weird. Wear your mask bigot!!

[–] • 0 pt

Read that in the accent, whingy voice. Thanks for the laugh

[–] • 3 pts
[–] • 5 pts

Thank you for that link. We should all print out this part and start taping them to store fronts and telephone poles around town.

Here's the conclusion part:

The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks.

Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression.

Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death.

Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health.

[–] • 4 pts

Thank you for making the effort to print the conclusion, it’s the most that the majority of those who see this link will read.

[–] • 3 pts

You are welcome. Too shocking not to post. Should be on the front cover of every newspaper but we know that won't happen. :)

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Make sure you include the website as a QRC code or link otherwise normies will dismiss it as they are too used to seeing propaganda in reverse

[–] • 0 pt

Good advice but I think normies dismiss everything that goes against what they think they know.

[–] • 1 pt

I think this part is also super important:

“Breathing is one of the most important physiological functions to sustain life and health. Human body requires a continuous and adequate oxygen (O2) supply to all organs and cells for normal function and survival. Breathing is also an essential process for removing metabolic byproducts [carbon dioxide (CO2)] occurring during cell respiration [12], [13]. It is well established that acute significant deficit in O2 (hypoxemia) and increased levels of CO2 (hypercapnia) even for few minutes can be severely harmful and lethal, while chronic hypoxemia and hypercapnia cause health deterioration, exacerbation of existing conditions, morbidity and ultimately mortality [11], [20], [21], [22].”

[–] • 1 pt

Thanks for sharing that part. Considering they are killing and injuring 1000's of people with these so called "vaccines" making people sick could certainly be their ultimate goal.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

The further we are isolated from each other, the better we can be controlled by the overlords. There's only one thing in the minds of these people and that is to sow division amongst normal people. The lies can be cooked up any way they want and will be kept on being repeated to drown out the truth.

[–] • 0 pt

Spot on. Reminds me of: "Tell a lie often enough and people will believe it to be the truth."

[–] • 1 pt

Never worn one, never will!

[–] • 0 pt

Brother , on Frank Speech live, Frontline Doctor stated the same facts. And also stated all we had needed was HCQ and Invermectin. And they have known this over a year, and Doctors were not allowed to say stop wearing masks, lockdowns are not needed, and that HCQ was safe.

[–] • 1 pt

I heard it is illegal to create a vaccine if there is a cure. Could this have something to do with their games over the past year?

[–] • 0 pt

Brother, the Frontline Doctor on Frank Speech ,stated today this was done for political and not health reasons. and she happens to also be a Atty. I am not sure about the legality of a vaccine if there is a cure, but common sense dictates a vaccine would never be needed.

[–] • 0 pt

It's never a good sign when a scientific paper is authored by only one person. In this case, this person is a street shitter almost unknown to the scientific community. I'd take it with a grain of salt.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Wow straight from the website itself. What was the name of the person that was leaving or got fired and replaced by a diversity hire?