Malone episode link: https://open.spotify.com/episode/3SCsueX2bZdbEzRtKOCEyT

Thank you, I guess I have to watch the all video on spotify, since these are just cuts.

You can at least give me a QRD. It's either that or I ignore you.

So, since you're an incompetent bitch, I decided to do it for you:

Trump is a monkey wrench, a chaos agent, for a brave new world.

I'm reluctant to continue after this retardation, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt I guess...

Cash App to Dorsey

So since Dorsey owns Cash App and since Cash Capp wants him to let them sponsor him, Rogan is in Dorsey's pocket? That's interesting considering that Rogan is a crypto skeptic, so those two ideas contradict a bit hard. Dorsey is a BTC maxie, so he stands more to gain by Rogan sponsoring the different kinds of BTC maxie-sponsored tech or initiatives, which entirely deflates this point. Big off.

23andMe

Yes, this connects to Alphabet in a few different ways. I can't deny that. What I can deny is the extent to which this matters. Alphabet is humongous. One of their subsidiaries seeking sponsorship on the biggest podcast ever isn't particularly surprising. He doesn't mention that as being very important, however. His points about LA have become deprecated, however, but this just seems tangential and unrelated to 23andMe. He then jumps on some tangent (which isn't wrong) about space and NASA and stuff.

Elon Musk

He bases "elon being a sponsor" on one guy saying once that he just bought a Tesla. How is this indicative that Elon sponsors the podcast? Does Joe need Elon to sponsor his podcast? The irrelevance is mounting here... I'm planning to buy one as my next vehicle. Am I suddenly sponsored by Elon or supporting the podcast now too? Besides, this was like a four second video. He could've been quoting someone for all we know.

They manipulated stock prices.

kek the stock market is bullshit anyway. Not only is them smoking weed on the podcast and Elon tweeting (why would the CEO these days not support stock buyers and try to secure more funding?) not relevant to Joe being a bad person, are we suppose to demonize either of them for wanting more money? Are you so poor and victim-brained that you need to complain about other people making money and then cast off someone who smokes weed with a camera around them as a "stock market manipulator"? These are retarded leaps to make.

Building engagement by "pretending to not know what Wyoming is makes him a bad actor that's paid by the government to get them to think things.

This just made me laugh. Joe is a middle aged man who smokes weed. He can't be stoney-brain for a few minutes without someone sperging about how he's comped? This kid is a retard.

Moralist arguments about technological advancement.

I know this will just make you gloss over, so I'll save you another rant of mine about this topic, but everyone that doesn't understand how technology works, how anatomy, neuroscience and all of these adjacent and overlapping topics is way too simple to participate in these conversations. Maybe you've seen my analogy like this before, which explains how stupid this argument is: maybe you like cars. You're a real car guy and you spent your youth helping your dad fix cars and since you've been enthralled by automobiles. If some retard in a Walmart parking lot starts asking you about how you got your transmission polished and waxed and fitted with new stickers because the ladies love them, you're just going to give them a blank, "oh, you're tripping balls or legally retarded" and you're going to ignore them, right? None of that is applicable, right? Isn't participating in a conversation that knows so little about something you're intimately familiar with just a plain waste of your time? That's what this topic is like for the daunted, moronic zombies who have the gall to be so fucking stupid.

Rogan described "future shock" before it entered the public consciousness.

This point lacked the most so far. How does him explaining people will be overloaded with information indicate he's some bad gay or whatever you think? He then references Jones, who he shit on otherwise... which is super confusing.

Onnit is important because Eddie Bravo is bad at explaining conspiracy theories and Jones uses a supplement that's molded after some of the things they've marketed.

This is a hazy comparison that is never fully linked. In fact, the point about Jones never comes back to Onnit either. He then just repeats, "mafia, corporate, pentagon", but never connects any of them... What this kid's doing is pretty low-tier and based purely on guilty by association leaps that hardly prove anything. In fact, most of what this guy is saying can easily be dispelled with a brief and simple, "yeah, but who is going to sponsor Rogan"? Who do you think should sponsor him? Aren't a lot of irredeemable people touching by at least two or three leaps most companies or efforts in this company? Maybe the basics of wealth, the economy and politics/subsidies needs to be explained again briefly.

Brendan Schaub does DMT

This part almost made me laugh. This kid seriously has no idea about Plant Medicine and just makes a fool of himself on this part. He doesn't mention how this connects to Aubrey, Onnit, Jones and especially not Rogan. I'm starting to question why I'm even still watching this and entertaining you and the kid here.

Zach is a bad guy who does X, Y and Z.

He never proves it or even further explains.

rockefellers fund MAPS

The clip of what Rogan said was cut short and the Rockefellers have extremely extensive connections. Them giving anyone $300k is like me giving a hobo a nickle. Again, I think a basic lesson of how economics works and how wealthy people operate their portfolios is in order. The idea that this is evidence of any sinister behavior on Rogan's part is only laughable. There is, without any doubt, serious and well-founded experimentation involving Plant Medicine and other kinds of psychedelics. Is someone laundering money there too? Yeah, no shit. Most industries help launder money and this is a basic understanding of extra-academic economics.

Just like Trump says leave Soros alone

kek I get it now. This is the same group of demoralized retards that are taking any opportunity, obscure and feigned or otherwise, to fracture the audience. Seeing these astroturf attempts in real time sure is entertaining though.

Weinstein, Peterson, midget rat and Rogan had dinner once

top kek this can't be serious. These guys are all pentagon and corporate assets because they had dinner one time? So are Briggs and Nick Johnson both spooks because they had a beer together at a bar in Oregon last month? Believe it or not, all of those guys are incredibly helpful in expanding Norman's overton window. Don't you see these are astroturf campaigns? Are there nosed people around them sometimes? Yeah, there sure are. Unfortunately, this is like asking why so many businesses have lawyers these days. The noses fit themselves in to these positions on purpose. That doesn't mean everyone around them is evil.

UBI is bad

I used to think so too. There's a ton of reasons this has to happen though, unfortunately. See my posts and look at the Raoul Pal video I posted not long ago. He explains all of this over a few hours. Since you made me watch this and you couldn't be bothered to be a big boy and show you're not retarded and incompetent, feel free to watch all of it and make up for it. Just because someone is a government asset doesn't mean they aren't a bad person. Terrance McKenna certainly wasn't a bad person and was very contributive, but he did work for the FBI.

conflating "jewish mysticism" and Thelema

Yeah, this guy is a moron that doesn't actually do research or attempt to discover more knowledgeable people's insights. Watch that video gothamgirl posted from Robert Sepehr earlier. He actually touches on just that.

These people are involved in MK-ULTRA style research programs.

MK was a huge umbrella. Also see SEARCH or OFTEN. It wasn't just about drug research, susceptibility, persuasion, learning and information extraction. There was also the extensive research that was done on trauma, metaphysics and much more. They also sprayed towns in Texas with Fetanyl. What he keeps repeating about this topic doesn't give me confidence in his actually having studied much of it.

How are these guys not getting arrested, like the Grateful Dead and those guys, for selling drugs?

Yeah, then he mentions "Halpergate"... which was someone getting arrested for producing and then selling drugs. kek Then he segways to Joey Diaz... who went to prison for dealing drugs. He contradicts himself within five minutes doing this. Not only have some of these guys been prosecuted, he uses it to prove a point he made after saying these guys never get in trouble for dealing drugs. I agree governments are the biggest drug dealers though, to his credit. Do I think Joe's friends deal drugs and stuff? Yes. I sure do. One of them even went to prison for it. Joe also talks about it all of the time. Is that a bad thing? I'm not convinced. This point is moot for me.

Joe Rogan takes an illegal substance on his podcast.

Yeah, this is based. Joe is too big to kill at this point and I think this kid is just pissed. Fungi is so much more important than this kid understands and talking about how Joe is a bad guy and pushing some agenda for helping people realize what they are is retarded. Is Soros really desperate for more people to eat fungi? I'm not so sure. I don't think he's thrilled about people gaining a keener intuition and extracting divine knowledge from within. But if you want to think that makes him a bad guy, i think what that makes you is base, vulgar and unworthy of deeper understanding.

Joe did a bump on his podcast.

This part was just dumb. Why does he think he was doing a bump? Is it really because the other guy Joe was talking to was making some gesture? What he is saying explains that and he's reaching here.

Hippies got infiltrated by people pushing psychedelics

I was surprised here. This is true, actually. A lot of the early LSD testing MK guys infiltrated these movements for sure and spread plenty of ideas that we can see residual elements of even today. How this relates to Rogan though is beyond me.

The naughty T word and Esalen

The naughty T word is always invovled in these kinds of things. He keeps saying the Soviet Union is behind things like what Yuri described, with the hippies and Esalen. It's not "the Soviet Union", it's the ones who inspired it, the ones who are intimately tied to the naughty T word.

Altered Carbon

It's hard not to giggle here. Stupid normies. They just don't get it... We're already in the era of clones and The 100-esque life iteration, full with body snatchers and everything. Altered Carbon is real and it's current... this isn't something that's coming up.

Jones and Rogan like a video game, Doom, so they're tied to military intelligence who want to "train people to kill people"

There's so much wrong with this section I don't even feel like responding to it.

Jamie makes mistakes some time.

This part just made me laugh. Jamie isn't always perfect at his job, so this is supposed to prove something, I guess...

jews practice nepotism

So Jamie's dad knows a "jew". Okay... The part about his dad being military intelligence is curious though. Do I think that's a bad thing, though? I'm not so sure. In fact, I have a lot of respect for plenty of military intelligence.

The Men Who Stare At Goats

He's right. It was a smokescreen. What was really going on was much more interesting and plenty of the stuff they were doing was stuff you and most other people wouldn't ever believe. They've even released some of that research, but anyone who speaks of it conveniently pretends it's not real, despite it explicitly being out in the open and tagged as such.

This was sort of interesting. The kid does do some research and I can't discount that. I liked what he said about Aquino and find that accurate. I also find that some of what he mentions about the naughty T word to be interesting. The trouble is Joe has to get sponsors from somewhere (well, had). The way economics works, the way the wealthy work and the way that humans work, you're not going to escape some of these systems. I think Esalen was doing work to try to reverse changes that are occurring today, which is a whole other discussion on its own. Ultimately, the naughty T word being involved in something like that wouldn't surprise me, but the kid never managed to tie MK-Ultra in to anything beyond bringing up Alan Watts, the McKennas and Yuri. This was overall pretty lacking for me and considering that the things he says, like how people deal drugs who Joe's around, despite him having lived in LA and being in the comedy scene (which is self-expanitory) or how Jamie's dad is in military intelligence, seem to lack overal depth, I don't see how you're really putting much stock in to this.

Look, Peterson, Weinstein, Rogan, Jones, Shapiro, all of those guys, they're all ecelebs. Should we follow them around and eat their shit? Nah. Of course not. They're all human. They all make mistakes. None of them are perfect. Are they all intelligence assets though? I highly doubt it. In fact, they do a lot of work to help inform normalfags in ways plenty of us don't have the patience for. Yes, they have some declawed views. Yes, they espouse normie-tier rhetoric sometimes. Again, they're not perfect. But to say they're all conspiring to deploy Pentagon psychological operations, that takes way too many steps for me and I make my living noticing patterns, macro trends and micro trends alike.

I think you've been beguiled by someone that's done more research than you and simply took the time to compile some of it.