WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

That really was some crafty piloting.

That really was some crafty piloting.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

You have no idea. Seriously to get a big plane feet off the deck and to hit precisely that spot? And a student pilot at that?

[–] 2 pts

If a plane could take down a tower, the pentagon should of been destroyed. If you watch the securty cam from the pentagon, the object is much smaller.

[–] 3 pts

And the fact that it was the fucking pentagon. One of the buildings with the most surveillance on the planet and all we get is one blurry gif.

Explanation:

After more than 50 years of high intensity use the building was ageing. Plans for refurbishment were hastily modified in the light of the 1995 Oklahoma bomb.

This meant protection against external explosions was rapidly incorporated: Kevlar mesh reinforced the masonry infill wall panels and modern blast resistant windows were installed.

But only one ‘wedge’ of the building had been refurbished before the terrorists struck, and it was the reinforced outer walls and window frames of this refurbished section that took the initial impact.

Source: https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/structural-strength-saved-pentagon-lives-on-9-11-13-02-2003/

[–] 2 pts

That diagram show wings on the plane. A more accurate depiction would be to remove them, since the live footage of the mess never showed wings or a hole large enough to have been created by the wings. In fact, just replace the pic of the plane with a missile and you will be more accurate.

[–] 2 pts
[–] 0 pt

Is that a cruise missile painted to look like a commercial jet? Why do they have this?

Oh wait, I think I know why.

[+] [deleted] 0 pt