WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

252

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

click bait title relying on up votes from those that don't read the first two lines of the article:

would only give judges expanded discretion to determine whether an adult must register as a sex offender

[–] 0 pt

I corrected the AP's pedo attempt to downplay this. There is zero reason for a 24 year old to have sex with a 14 year old. None.

That's still an insane bill. Of course we know how kike judges will rule on this stuff. I want to know if I'm about to move next to pieces of shit like that. Another thing they do is let sex offenders plead down from level 2/3 sex offenders down to level 1 to where they don't have to register. This means there could be some really crazy sex offenders that aren't registered.

[–] 1 pt

According to the ap after 14 you are no longer a child, I guess.

I sincerely hope this brainwashed reporter has a 14 year old daughter that is groomed and repeatedly sodomized by a 24 year old HIV+ illegal alien (since knowingly infecting another is not a crime either).

Something tells me the reporter would be proud of their daughter for being woke......

[–] 1 pt

Sweet I'm movin to caLIFORNIA

[–] 1 pt

So homosexual pedophilia and child grooming is normal in Calif... oh.. nevermind. The modern day Sodom and Gomorrah.

[–] 0 pt

Good thing I identify as a 24 year old.

[–] 0 pt

But what about vaginal sex? Or vaginas are so 19th century that i should be ashamed for showing my inability to follow trends by asking this question?

[–] 0 pt

In California the elite prefer the underage male adolescent version. The mangina or bagina in their bum.