WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

Indecent exposure means nothing to these people.

Indecent exposure means nothing to these people.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

I ardently agree that men should not be allowed to shower and engage with females in locker rooms, I can't believe it's even a question. The problem being, no teenage girl was legitimately traumatized by seeing some fuck ugly cock. Trauma is a real thing. Seeing a dick cannot reasonably be said to qualify as traumatic. If so, I think bitch needs to recalibrate her sensitivity levels. Histrionic is not a valid operational state.

[–] 0 pt

What did the fuck ugly cock need to do then? Sometimes it's just the thoughts of what can or could have happened.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

This is remedial. Seeing a penis cannot reasonably said to be traumatic. Imagining unrealized possibilities is not traumatic. We live in a histrionic society where safe spaces are necessary, victimhood is fetishized as a cardinal virtue, and offense is considered sufficient harm to justify a criminal hate crime charge. This level of indoctrination cuts both ways. Trans-everything is a malignant societal sickness. Men sharing women's spaces, like showers, bathrooms, and locker rooms is inappropriate and will lead to assaults. However, claiming the teenaged girl suffered a legitimate trauma is faggotry of the highest order. At worst she was uncomfortable and/or grossed out. But in no sane world does viewing an unwanted penis qualify for the label. It's just one more example of leftism's influence on our collective consciousness. We have become just as weak, just as fragile, as they. The only difference is they have the enforcement arm of the government to ensure their will is carried into effect.

[–] 2 pts

We used to arrest them for indecent exposure and sexual assault.

[–] 1 pt

I hope they arrested that disgusting transphobe on the spot.