Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

422

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

Not a single example in the article of what we might have gotten wrong?

[–] • 5 pts

Humans are one race goy. diversity is our strength. don't question the science, science. Have mixed babies.

[–] • 2 pts

This is actually very common in Dinosaur biology since we dont have any dna to sample. They reshuffle the family trees regularly with new discoveries.

I cant remember a specific example but it gets mentioned on the youtube channel Moth Light Media. I highly suggest watching the videos. he kindof talks about it here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaIN0V58sXg

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Only this nugget: "For example, tiny elephant shrews, aardvarks, elephants, golden moles and swimming manatees have all come from the same big branch of mammal evolution—despite the fact that they look completely different from one another (and live in very different ways)."

An elephant shrew looks like this: https://www.treehugger.com/thmb/VKOpt-Yx9k16w-trh4lB7l3Gm7k=/400x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/somali-sengi_shrew-efbb431b110e49eeb681cdaa76ef4eb2.jpg

These ferocious shrews sometimes have venomous saliva.

[–] • 2 pts

Molecular evolutionary trees show that elephant shrews are more closely related to elephants, than they are to shrews

Well duh, it's right in the name.

[–] • 1 pt

Were wrong. Many were corrected when genetic data came along.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

they usually are wrong

so far they've never been "right" because they are constantly changing "being revised as new evidence is presented accepted"

[–] • 0 pt

"University of Bath suggests that determining evolutionary trees of organisms by comparing anatomy rather than gene sequences is misleading."

Turns out evolution recreates the same solutions via different evolutionary histories all the time.

Dolphins once had feet and lived on land but they reevolved into flippers after returning to the ocean.

[–] • 0 pt

"University of Bath suggests that determining evolutionary trees of organisms by comparing anatomy rather than gene sequences is misleading. The study, published in Communications Biology, shows that we often need to overturn centuries of scholarly work that classified living things according to how they look."

Now apply this to racial studies.