Derrrr, numbers are pretty.
Sure, but what’s the application? Exhaust?
Aerodynamics, underbody aero. You'd be surprised how easy it is to get aero choking in small passages, especially when aided by ground effect. Just the physical act of driving over a mass of air compresses it to an extent, that compression creates a venturi effect where the air tries to escape and return to its original state as quickly as possible.
I learned this when using pitot tubes to validate HVAC systems, we were wondering why the readings and predicted airflow weren't matching up, turns out the shape of the ducting was accelerating air enough to choke the pitot tubes giving us faulty readings. Our own stupidity opened up greater understanding.
Ah. Yes, Ive had that as well. Airflow must be measured in a non transition zone. Exhausts approaching supersonic speed behave a bit differently, and the loss of temperature and volume is offsettable with tapered pipe and insulation. The boundary layers are fun to play with, I came up with a neat way of dealing with them that worked both low and high rpm with gains on both. The prototypes broke all the normal rules, at some point I may build a few more and patent them.
Yep if the temps go down it's easier to get sonic choking, hot air is less dense which is the equivalent of increasing cross sectional area. Hotter temps means it takes more to reach mach 1, so keeping the exhaust nice and hot buys you some wiggle room. Once you get sonic choking, the boundary layer shows you the shape you need to make the wall in order to get max efficiency. You just have to run the thing at the flow rate you want, then capture the boundary layer (PID/Schlerien/CFD), then design the walls to mimic the shape of the BL, then you cut losses dramatically. The flow can just follow the wall curvature instead of creating losses to define its own path of least resistance. You basically make it easy for the flow, and it keeps accelerating.
https://share.southbox.de/f.php?h=1RMD9k4o&p=1
You'd think that it's only a coincidence that this cross sectional schematic looks like the plan form of a bird?
(post is archived)