WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

147

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Oops!

How are they going to put that cat back in?

[–] 1 pt

Sounds like fraud to me. Publish a fake paper then immediately start looking for investors.

[–] 1 pt

Reminds me of the alzheimers guys fucking fraudulent studies, it's too bad no one caught onto that as fast as this case.

[–] 1 pt

“We stand by our work, and it’s been verified experimentally and theoretically,” Dias says. Nine people on the team from a US University defend their work claiming the experiment was and is repeatable. The chief critic is a theoretical physicist. I wonder if really powerful people don't want this technology released to the public. Even a 10 percent reduction in resistance as compared to copper would be huge.

[–] 0 pt

I don't know. Right now, this is a pipe dream, so it may be they were trying a cash grab.

[–] 1 pt

replication crisis