>To read the Cult of Mac journalists who dominate Big Tech reporting Not even close? >Apple has experienced something it isn’t used to: Bad PR in the wake of essentially banning popular social media app Parler from its phones without publicly providing any truthful explanation. What bad PR? What did anyone, anywhere do? Nothing. At all. No one cares. >Why talk about how we’re profiting from religious genocide in China? Why is it bad to exterminate dune coons? >Let that sink in a moment: In an interview about a massive, humiliating, and illegal breach of Apple customer’s privacy, Cook turned the subject to Facebook’s privacy policies. Because it had literally nothing to do with iCloud. They were phished and willingly gave up their passwords. The author, being too stupid to know what phishing is or do any research whatsoever, thinks it’s Apple’s fault. >Of course, a company that profits from the vast Chinese slave state You mean Facebook? You mean The Federalist, which is run by a plagiarist and bans anyone who says anything in favor of whites? What’s the difference? >Zuckerberg is the sole tech titan to push back on the woke left’s plan to control and censor speech and people deemed threatening to the woke left. # This subhuman piece of shit actually thinks we will believe this statement. >influential tech journalist Kara Swisher The jewish whore? Why do we care what she says? >Mark Zuckerberg’s statement that he did not want to be an ‘arbiter of the truth.’ My question for him: Why then did he build a platform that requires it? What’s wrong with her question? Facebook objectively does not do what the author claims. >They allow a sprawling monopoly committed to controlling your speech to play champion of your privacy. You mean Facebook? Google? Microsoft?