This comes as the next front on the feminist-tranny war:
‘Twitter would never have attracted the hundreds of millions of users it boasts today had Twitter let it be known that it would arbitrarily ban users who did not agree with the political and social views of its management or impose sweeping new policies banning the expression of widely-held viewpoints and perspectives on public issues,’ Murphy’s lawyers submitted.
Smart! Now why didn't anyone on the right side of the spectrum bring such a suit first, when we know now that they ban 21x as much right-wing as left-wing?
This comes as the next front on the feminist-tranny war:
> ‘Twitter would never have attracted the hundreds of millions of users it boasts today had Twitter let it be known that it would arbitrarily ban users who did not agree with the political and social views of its management or impose sweeping new policies banning the expression of widely-held viewpoints and perspectives on public issues,’ Murphy’s lawyers submitted.
Smart! Now why didn't anyone on the right side of the spectrum bring such a suit first, when we know now that they ban 21x as much right-wing as left-wing?
(post is archived)