WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

411

I was just looking up the wiki entry for 'globalism' and well, that's not what I expected at all.

I was just looking up the wiki entry for 'globalism' and well, that's not what I expected at all.

(post is archived)

Paul James defines globalism "at least in its more specific use [...] as the dominant ideology and subjectivity associated with different historically-dominant formations of global extension.

I know its edited, but even the basic definition used at the end is nothing more than jewish psychobabble

[–] 1 pt

Wikipedia isn't a valid source of reliable information.

[–] 1 pt

I love how your Wikipedia article uses one singular definition to myopically "set the record straight stupid righties" while dismissing its equally correct definition of "the ideological belief that nation-state should be superimposed by a singular global regulatory authority."

If you go look in a dictionary there are words with MORE than one definition. Some even have more than TWO! GASP!

[–] 0 pt

It is fun when that happens.

This video is a little long but very relevant if you are looking into that topic.

https://youtu.be/1BkqjaR28Wo