WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

I found this quote somewhere:

"The Nuremberg Court HANGED people for forcing medicines on unwilling people. Are you suggesting our health service should act like Nazi's?"

[–] 1 pt

Oh... that's good. Really good.

[–] 1 pt

I just think it's funny that people still think the legal system is a way to win..

If the law / rules look to be on your side, they will change them. It's well beyond law and the constitution now. The jews own america, they own your religions, they own your banks, your media, your tech companies.. what is sad is that even those who say they are so opposed to the jews are still worshipping the jew god. When they own your religion, they own YOU.

[–] 0 pt

• According to , an individual has “the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.” In other words, you can refuse it, but rest assured they left a broad opening for consequences. What kind of “consequences” might they be referring to? It doesn’t say. Does this mean consequences from getting sick, or does it open the doors for getting fired, or not being allowed into society as well?