Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

417

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

The agency's foot-dragging is directly at odds with the pro-vaccine message coming from the White House. After all, a skeptic might ask, how could it be so important that everyone get vaccinated if even the FDA is hesitant about these injections?

I thought it was about “science” not what the White House wants?

And a drug approved in 18 months lol. How many thalidomide babies did the US have versus Europe, that’s always been the excuse of why we take it slow and need long term studies.

[–] • 0 pt

Hey , what did you not like about the article?

[–] • 1 pt

About the article? The dramatically-flawed logic and use of proof through repeated assertion. Plus the basic fact that the FDA's job is to be skeptical. You know, proof of efficacy by statistical comparison with a control group, for example. Or requiring properly-constructed tests instead of accepting widespread distribution of an untested substance as if it was an actual test.

Having said that, I downvoted the post as a stand-in for the article. And the only thing I disliked about the post was the headline, which was probably auto-generated, but I think is misleading for both the post and for the article.

Down-vote retracted.

[–] • 0 pt

About the article? The dramatically-flawed logic and use of proof through repeated assertion. Plus the basic fact that the FDA's job is to be skeptical. You know, proof of efficacy by statistical comparison with a control group, for example. Or requiring properly-constructed tests instead of accepting widespread distribution of an untested substance as if it was an actual test.

Having said that, I downvoted the post as a stand-in for the article. And the only thing I disliked about the post was the headline, which was probably auto-generated, but I think is misleading for both the post and for the article.

Down-vote retracted.

Actually, with a well-reasoned response like that I don't question the down-vote at all. :-)