Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

339

A U.S. district court judge has halted California from implementing a law allows medical professionals to be punished for giving patients information about COVID-19 that is "contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus."

California Eastern District Judge William Shubb on Wednesday ruled that the "consensus" on COVID is so vague and ill-defined that the physician plaintiffs are "unable to determine if their intended conduct contradicts the scientific consensus, and accordingly 'what is prohibited by the law.'"

> A U.S. district court judge has halted California from implementing a law allows medical professionals to be punished for giving patients information about COVID-19 that is "contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus." > California Eastern District Judge William Shubb on Wednesday ruled that the "consensus" on COVID is so vague and ill-defined that the physician plaintiffs are "unable to determine if their intended conduct contradicts the scientific consensus, and accordingly 'what is prohibited by the law.'"

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

Very good news. Just shocking that the American Medical Association and California Medical Association were not challenging a law that gags doctors about what they can discuss with their patients. The AMA and CMA are so cucked to the pharma industry that they do not represent doctors.

[–] • 0 pt

The AMA and CMA are so cucked to the pharma industry

The nail. Right on the head, is where you hit it.