WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

764

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts (edited )

Everytime I see "scientist" in any headline, I brace myself for a whopper of a lie. I'm never disappointed.

According to the study, one in four people who received a Covid mRNA injection suffered an “unintended immune response.”

the “unintended immune response” was “created by a glitch.”

Unintended? Glitch?

“Cambridge scientists found such vaccines were not perfect and sometimes led to nonsense proteins being made instead of the desired Covid ‘spike’

Not perfect? Depends on the design specifications.

when this partially synthetic code is read, the protein-making machine in the body sometimes struggles with the uridine analogs.

This reads like a propaganda piece: "sometimes struggles". Poor mental gymnastics.

updated vaccines that use the improved form of mRNA are in the works for cancer jabs, and other therapeutics

Trust us next time, we pinky swear we'll get it right. We promise.

The Cambridge study found Covid shots create a “nonsensical and harmless protein,” that would be attacked by the body.

This response leads to an immune system flare-up.

LOL

[–] 1 pt

Brace? Time to embrace, goy.

[–] 1 pt

Whenever I see the word, "glitch," in a mainstream publication I interpret it as, "the operators of the system who created a system to injure people with little political power. There will be no justice for the aggrieved party."

However, the scientists note in their paper that the “unintended immune response” was “created by a glitch.”

[–] 0 pt

The headline is a lie. An “unintended immune response” does not equal VAIDS. Not even close.

These bullshit headlines are why I usually skip any articles on poal about covid.

[–] 0 pt

Slaynews? Is that the new real raw news BS?

[–] 0 pt

le site i don't like... you know you could actually follow the links in the article to the studies