![Exact same. No difference. None. Bigot. [750x822 - 114KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/6mLqil.jpg){kind=link}
Meet Chester. Chester looks like a mouse. Chester lives in a stable and is considered a horse.
Meet Chester. Chester looks like a mouse. Chester lives in a stable and is considered a horse.
I don't care how much you liberal cunts want to prove a point.
Niggers are not human.
I don't care how much you liberal cunts want to prove a point.
Niggers are not human.
Nice! Shoveled right thru the pseudo crap and got right to the point.
Nice! Shoveled right thru the pseudo crap and got right to the point.
There is so much wrong in that it's hard to know where to start. Dogs are a domesticated animals changed by man and not really a good analogy for comparing separate species and are clades of the wolf, a created "subspecies".
The bottom one is also problematic as the term race is another word for subspecies. Clearly the races (subspecies) of man are not really subspecies but in fact should be considered separate species. It also is extremely unlikely they all "branched off" a mere 40,000 years ago. I'd also like to point out that the subsaharan species of man never domesticated any animals, unlike the caucasian and asian species of man.
Before anyone goes on about the 1st grade definition of a species being a group that can interbreed and produce fertile offspring they should go look at the dozens of cases of two different species who have produced fertile offspring and I am talking about birds, mammals, and reptiles.
There is so much wrong in that it's hard to know where to start.
Dogs are a domesticated animals changed by man and not really a good analogy for comparing separate species
and are clades of the wolf, a created "subspecies".
The bottom one is also problematic as the term race is another word for subspecies.
Clearly the races (subspecies) of man are not really subspecies but in fact should be considered separate species.
It also is extremely unlikely they all "branched off" a mere 40,000 years ago.
I'd also like to point out that the subsaharan species of man never domesticated any animals, unlike the caucasian and asian species of man.
Before anyone goes on about the 1st grade definition of a species being a group that can interbreed and produce fertile offspring they should go look at the dozens of cases of two different species who have produced fertile offspring and I am talking about birds, mammals, and reptiles.
Was going to point this out but you did it first.
IIRC sub-saharan africans and humans (Europeans/Asians) last common ancestor was at least 85kya. What isn't known is if that last common ancestor was European man recolonizing africa or vice versa.
Europeans and Asians also have Neanderthal and (Neanderthal, Red-deer-cave-people, Denisovan) dna respectively, whereas SS africans have "ghost" populations of some, as yet, not identified hominid- but probably homo erectus.
Was going to point this out but you did it first.
IIRC sub-saharan africans and humans (Europeans/Asians) last common ancestor was at least 85kya. What isn't known is if that last common ancestor was European man recolonizing africa or vice versa.
Europeans and Asians also have Neanderthal and (Neanderthal, Red-deer-cave-people, Denisovan) dna respectively, whereas SS africans have "ghost" populations of some, as yet, not identified hominid- but probably homo erectus.
https://i.ibb.co/0JKyW8c/Obviously-Same-Species.png
Forensic doctors can determine race just from skeletal remains, no DNA test needed.
This is because there are consistent traits within each race that are not present in others - such as prognathism & denser bone structure in blacks.
In any other animal on the planet, if you can differentiate between two groups by skeletal structure alone, they are classified as different species.
And we arent even touching other differentiating factors here, such as average group IQ, mating habits, child rearing, etc., that would be used as further evidence of separate species if we were talking about simians or canids.
While they can have fertile offspring with each other, dogs & wolves are separate species. The same goes for brown bears & polar bears, so blacks & Whites having fertile offspring doesn't disprove this.
We might all be human, but Blacks are not the same species of human as Whites.
Forensic doctors can determine race just from skeletal remains, no DNA test needed.
This is because there are consistent traits within each race that are not present in others - such as prognathism & denser bone structure in blacks.
In *any* other animal on the planet, if you can differentiate between two groups by skeletal structure alone, they are classified as different species.
And we arent even touching other differentiating factors here, such as average group IQ, mating habits, child rearing, etc., that would be used as further evidence of separate species if we were talking about simians or canids.
While they can have fertile offspring with each other, dogs & wolves are separate species. The same goes for brown bears & polar bears, so blacks & Whites having fertile offspring doesn't disprove this.
We might all be human, but Blacks are *not* the same species of human as Whites.
What’s up with the pedo swirl in this graphic?
What’s up with the pedo swirl in this graphic?
It's a Dreamstime watermark (stock photo website) I think.
It's a Dreamstime watermark (stock photo website) I think.
I didn't notice it really. I thought it was the He-boon's earring.
I didn't notice it really. I thought it was the He-boon's earring.
branched off more like 400,000 years ago.
branched off more like 400,000 years ago.
Don’t compare odin’s dogs to niggers.
Don’t compare odin’s dogs to niggers.
I'm sensing some sarcasm from OP
I'm sensing some sarcasm from OP
(post is archived)