>...then why did the local police not leave once the offender was off the property? The property is more than just the inside of the restaurant. So... that's why. Also he didn't just leave as he had been legally ordered to do. He stayed for quite a while, well longer than necessary for the police to start using force, and ask more and more retarded questions. He may be a journalist but he wasn't a journalist here. >Why did they then serve as an armed detail for the principle's egress? Because it isn't the job of the police to determine if a crime has been committed and is going to be charged. That's the (A)DA's job. Police don't press charges, they don't do a thing further than what the (A)DA tells them. After the arrest a preliminary hearing happens in which a judge rules if there is enough evidence to allow the charges to follow through. So that's why. The police aren't there for the reason of arresting someone on someone else's claim the law was broken. The police are there for the immediate crime that's taking place, the trespass. >Why is logic so hard? It's not. You haven't argued a single point of logic prior to that statement or after that statement. Are you sure you know what 'logic' is? What you should have asked, were you right, would be "Why is US law so hard?". Except you were wrong there too. Let's try multiple choice which scenario fits all the facts: 1. The police were there to arrest anyone where there was evidence of violating a state law (Lets say trespass and admitting to discrimination in hiring practices) 2. The police were only there to only enforce the trespass law and had no other motivation 3. The police were there to protect the other government rulers intimidate journalists and used the trespass excuse as cover. >1. This is two points in one combined with "and" pick one. >>trespass This. This is why they are there as is obvious. >>discrimination in hiring practices No. Obviously not. The DA hasn't filed charges, doesn't know, or doesn't care because he's a jewish led DA. >2. This. >3. Cool pilpul. Despite your attempt to sound smart, you aren't. You're at best an emotional reddit-NPC cooomer. You've proven nothing, shown no evidence of anything and are posting an attempt of "GOTCHA" while wrong about everything you've written. Anything that you have written lends itself to you wanting the police to be a totalitarian, jew-owned, (((NKVD))), police. That isn't what these police were. * Also during trespass calls police generally stay around due to the chance that the party who was trespassed doesn't come back with violent intent. It's SOP and even with the obvious and unlikely chance of this happening in this case it's irrelevant. Trespass was given,PV should have stopped playing jews-victims and left as they were told. >Excusing this behavior and pretending it isn't a problem makes you culpable. Shut the fuck up. You're too low-IQ piece to even pretend to be that arrogant.