WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

162

Cruz’s question began, “While violent riots were raging, Kamala Harris said on national TV, ‘They’re not gonna let up, and they should not,’” quoting viral comments then-Sen. Harris (D-CA) made on the Late Show with Stephen Colbert last June in reference to nationwide Black Lives Matter protests

Cruz’s question continued, “Using the manager’s proposed standard, is there any coherent way for Donald Trump’s words to be incitement and Kamala Harris’s words not to be incitement?”

>Lead House impeachment manager Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) responded to the question by saying on the chamber floor that he was “not familiar” with the quote from Harris that Cruz had referenced; however, Trump attorney Michael T. van der Veek rejected that notion during his own response to Cruz, saying his team had given video to the House’s team of Harris’s quote and that they had played the video three times that day. > Raskin also said that despite not recognizing the quote, he finds it “absolutely unimaginable that Vice President Harris would ever incite violence or encourage or promote violence. Obviously, it’s completely irrelevant to the proceeding at hand, and I will allow her to defend herself.”

>In a related question during the trial, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) asked on behalf of himself, Cruz, Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS), and Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND), “Does a politician raising bail for rioters encourage more rioting?” A representative from Trump’s legal team replied, “Yes.”

Cruz’s question began, “While violent riots were raging, Kamala Harris said on national TV, ‘They’re not gonna let up, and they should not,’” quoting viral comments then-Sen. Harris (D-CA) made on the Late Show with Stephen Colbert last June in reference to nationwide Black Lives Matter protests Cruz’s question continued, “Using the manager’s proposed standard, is there any coherent way for Donald Trump’s words to be incitement and Kamala Harris’s words not to be incitement?” >>Lead House impeachment manager Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) responded to the question by saying on the chamber floor that he was “not familiar” with the quote from Harris that Cruz had referenced; however, Trump attorney Michael T. van der Veek rejected that notion during his own response to Cruz, saying his team had given video to the House’s team of Harris’s quote and that they had played the video three times that day. >> Raskin also said that despite not recognizing the quote, he finds it “absolutely unimaginable that Vice President Harris would ever incite violence or encourage or promote violence. Obviously, it’s completely irrelevant to the proceeding at hand, and I will allow her to defend herself.” >>In a related question during the trial, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) asked on behalf of himself, Cruz, Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS), and Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND), “Does a politician raising bail for rioters encourage more rioting?” A representative from Trump’s legal team replied, “Yes.”

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Like they give a fuck. Their base is full of fucking retards, and they know it. If you just took the fucking D and R off the ballots the democrats would never win another election again virtually anywhere.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

The impeachment isn't even legal or real. Stop giving the commie propaganda the time of day.

Distractions.

[–] 0 pt

The basis for the impeachment isn't real. But the Trial Is Happening. Even if you want to ignore it. You can hide your head in the sand, or you can be productive. In this post I am relating what happened.. it really happened.. even if you don't agree with it.. it happened. If you choose to remain uniformed of your enemies movements, your failure is all on you.

So Shut Up Shill.

And all you other ignorant shills that jumped on this post like a hobo on a ham sandwich.

Keep giving legitimacy to the communists. So woke. Lmao

[–] 1 pt

Can anyone remind me WHY we need congress again? The reason I ask is they've been absolutely useless for the last 60 years or more... Wouldn't the nation be better off without it? Asking for a friend.

[–] 0 pt

Boy, I just love a good game of Gotcha!

It accomplishes so much.

[–] 0 pt

The protests, which were sparked by the death of George Floyd at the hands of police in May, were largely peaceful, but, in many instances, ended up devolving into destructive riots throughout the country that included vandalism, looting, fires, violence, injury, and in some cases even death over the course of several months in 2020.

This article still cannot help toeing the line and gaslighting the narrative.

•George overdosed. That's entirely different from dying at the hands of the police.

•The protests were entirely not peaceful and saw some of the most destruction to public and private property outside of a natural disaster. Even smaller protests used threats, coercion, and other tactics of intimidation to have unwitting bystanders kneel or raise fists in solidarity.

[–] 0 pt

doesn't matter because they control the house and senate, Trump can show that Biden personally led the charge into the Capitol and they'd still find Trump guilty

[–] 1 pt

Doubtful.

While I think 3-6 (((republican))) senators will flip. That only puts them at 53-56. A bit off of the 67 required.

I could be wrong, but it doesn't look that way.

[+] [deleted] 0 pt